Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-06-05 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-06-05 House Journal Page 4679 HB 1001 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 1001 An Act making appropriations for the operating expenses of the executive branch of state government; and providing for an effective date. 1996-06-05 House Journal Page 4680 HB 1001 with the: Journal Page FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 10DP 4678 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 1001(FIN) An Act making appropriations relating to fire suppression, cleanup, and response and to disaster relief; and providing for an effective date. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB1001(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Mackie objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 1001(FIN) was read the third time. **The presence of Representative Kubina was noted. The question being: Shall CSHB 1001(FIN) pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 1001(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams, Willis 1996-06-05 House Journal Page 4681 HB 1001 Excused: Davies, James, Kohring, Kott, Ogan, Toohey And so, CSHB 1001(FIN) passed the House. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Navarre gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHB 1001(FIN). HB 1001 Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration of CSHB 1001(FIN) be taken up on the same day. Representative Mackie objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 1001(FIN) was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: Shall CSHB 1001(FIN) pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 1001(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: Davies, James, Kohring, Kott, Ogan, Toohey And so, CSHB 1001(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration. 1996-06-05 House Journal Page 4682 HB 1001 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 1001(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.