Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/29/1996 04:24 PM Senate TRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE TRANSPORTATION
April 29, 1996
4:24 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Steve Rieger, Chairman
Senator Robin Taylor, Vice Chair
Senator Lyda Green
Senator Georgianna Lincoln
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Al Adams
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
SENATE BILL NO. 290
"An Act making capital and other appropriations; and providing for
an effective date."
PREVIOUS SENATE ACTION
SB 290 - See Senate Transportation minutes dated 4/9/96, 4/11/96,
4/16/96.
WITNESS REGISTER
ACTION NARRATIVE
TAPE 96-20, SIDE A
SB 290 APPROPRIATIONS: CAPITAL & OTHERS
CHAIRMAN RIEGER called the Senate Transportation meeting to order
at 4:24 p.m. and introduced SB 290 as the first order of business
before the committee. He informed the committee that there was a
draft CS that he did not intend to move today.
SENATOR GREEN moved that CSSB 290(TRA) be adopted in lieu of the
original bill. Hearing no objection, the CS was adopted.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER reiterated that he did not intend to move the bill
today. He discussed the changes in the CS and pointed out that
there are no deletions of any project recommended from the
Governor, except those recommended for deletion by the Governor.
The capital matching grants are adopted by the legislative
financial staff with no changes. The main change is in the
allocations. He asked if committee members had questions.
Number 058
SENATOR LINCOLN asked if Chairman Rieger had received her amendment
that changed what the money would be used for in a community, but
not the dollar amount. She gave the amendment to committee staff
for distribution.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked if Senator Lincoln's amendment merely renamed
the designation of the project within a community. SENATOR LINCOLN
replied yes. She said that the committee staff just informed her
that her amendment was encompassed in the CS. However, she had
another amendment that would change the front change section, but
not the dollar figure.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked Chairman Rieger to explain the changes in the
DOT portion of the bill.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER explained that there were appropriations that did
not have allocations specified. The CS places the allocations in
the capital budget. State allocations do not restrict the
flexibility to adjust dollar totals, but it provides greater
clarity.
Number 109
SENATOR LINCOLN noted that a copy of her amendment had been passed
out. The amendment noted that the City of Tuluksak had changed to
the Tuluksak I.R.A. Council which was identified in the incorrect
place in the bill. Tuluksak should be identified in the beginning
of the bill.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER had no objection to Senator Lincoln offering her
amendment for consideration.
SENATOR LINCOLN moved Amendment 1.
SENATOR TAYLOR objected. How would the amendment comport with the
provisions in the operating budget where there is a distinction
between a nonprofit corporation and a tribal entity? SENATOR
LINCOLN said that Tuluksak would be in the same position as
communities that are I.R.A.s and are not nonprofits.
SENATOR TAYLOR felt that communities should be treated in the same
way in the operating budget as well as the capital budget. If
Senator Halford's legal opinions are correct, then there should be
consistency. For purposes of receiving the grant, perhaps the name
should be changed to Tuluksak Community Nonprofit.
Number 159
SENATOR LINCOLN explained that Tuluksak went through a process with
the Department of Community and Regional Affairs to become an
I.R.A. Council. Anything within this bill carries that forward for
all of the communities.
SENATOR TAYLOR did not know if I.R.A.s were distinguished or not.
If the legislation passes will the Tanana Chief Council have to
create a nonprofit corporation to receive and distribute those
funds? SENATOR LINCOLN understood that the community would have to
establish a non profit entity in order to receive funds. This
would fall under the same category, if that legislation was
adopted.
SENATOR TAYLOR emphasized that this should be a policy decision
when the capital budget is structured. He reiterated that there
should be consistency. The policy should be clarified before the
amendment is added.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER informed the committee that the other budgets
utilized blanket language in the front. He indicated that it is
probably a different set of issues for a grant for a capital item
as opposed to a grant to someone to provide a service.
Number 214
SENATOR GREEN inquired as to the part that Senator Lincoln referred
to that was already included in the CS. SENATOR LINCOLN said that
was another amendment.
SENATOR LINCOLN withdrew her amendment.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if anyone wanted to testify. Hearing no one,
the meeting was adjourned at 4:48 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|