03/12/2021 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB9 | |
| SB88 | |
| SB11 | |
| Adjourn |
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 88 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
SENATE LABOR AND COMMERCE STANDING COMMITTEE
March 12, 2021
1:29 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Mia Costello, Chair
Senator Joshua Revak
Senator Gary Stevens
Senator Elvi Gray-Jackson
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Roger Holland, Vice Chair
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
SENATE BILL NO. 9
"An Act relating to alcoholic beverages; relating to the
regulation of manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers of
alcoholic beverages; relating to licenses, endorsements, and
permits involving alcoholic beverages; relating to common
carrier approval to transport or deliver alcoholic beverages;
relating to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to
offenses involving alcoholic beverages; amending Rule 17(h),
Alaska Rules of Minor Offense Procedure; and providing for an
effective date."
- MOVED SB 9 OUT OF COMMITTEE
SENATE BILL NO. 88
"An Act relating to the state insurance catastrophe reserve
account; and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD AND HELD
SENATE BILL NO. 11
"An Act relating to community property and to community property
trusts; and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: SB 9
SHORT TITLE: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL; ALCOHOL REG
SPONSOR(s): SENATOR(s) MICCICHE
01/22/21 (S) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
01/22/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/22/21 (S) L&C, JUD, FIN
02/12/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/12/21 (S) Heard & Held
02/12/21 (S) MINUTE(L&C)
03/03/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/03/21 (S) Scheduled but Not Heard
03/10/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/10/21 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/12/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
BILL: SB 88
SHORT TITLE: STATE INSUR. CATASTROPHE RESERVE ACCT.
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR
02/22/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/22/21 (S) L&C, FIN
03/10/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/10/21 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/12/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
BILL: SB 11
SHORT TITLE: COMMUNITY PROPERTY TRUSTS
SPONSOR(s): BEGICH
01/22/21 (S) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
01/22/21 (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
01/22/21 (S) L&C, JUD
03/10/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/10/21 (S) -- MEETING CANCELED --
03/12/21 (S) L&C AT 1:30 PM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
WITNESS REGISTER
SENATOR PETER MICCICHE
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of SB 9.
LEE ELLIS, President
Brewers Guide of Alaska;
President, Midnight Sun Brewing Company
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 9.
ROBIN MINARD
MatSu Health Foundation
Wasilla, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in strong support of SB 9.
EVAN WOOD, Co-owner and Co-founder
Devils Club Brewery
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 9.
SARAH OATS, President
Alaska Cabaret Hotel Restaurant and Retailers Association
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 9.
TIFFANY HALL, Executive Director
Recover Alaska
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 9.
JEANNE REILLY
Reilly's Irish Pub
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in full support of SB 9.
SCOTT JORDAN, Director
Division of Risk Management
Department of Administration (DOA)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented SB 88 on behalf of the
administration.
SENATOR TOM BEGICH (via Teams)
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Sponsor of SB 11
BRIX HAHN, Staff
Senator Tom Begich
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the sponsor statement and
sectional analysis for SB 11 on behalf of the sponsor.
DAVE SHAFTEL, representing self
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 11.
MATHEW BLATTMACHR
Peak Trust Company
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of SB 11.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:29:47 PM
CHAIR MIA COSTELLO called the Senate Labor and Commerce Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:29 p.m. Present at the call to
order were Senators Gray-Jackson, Revak, Stevens, and Chair
Costello.
CHAIR COSTELLO reviewed the agenda.
SB 9-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL; ALCOHOL REG
1:30:26 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 9,
"An Act relating to alcoholic beverages; relating to the
regulation of manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers of
alcoholic beverages; relating to licenses, endorsements, and
permits involving alcoholic beverages; relating to common
carrier approval to transport or deliver alcoholic beverages;
relating to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; relating to
offenses involving alcoholic beverages; amending Rule 17(h),
Alaska Rules of Minor Offense Procedure; and providing for an
effective date."
1:31:12 PM
SENATOR PETER MICCICHE, sponsor of SB 9, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, summarized that the goal of the
legislation is to modernize the Title 4 alcohol statutes with
changes that improve the processes for public safety, public
health, and the industry.
1:32:12 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO opened public testimony on SB 9.
1:32:24 PM
LEE ELLIS, President, Brewers Guide of Alaska; President,
Midnight Sun Brewing Company, Anchorage, Alaska, stated that it
has taken nine years of hard work to come to consensus on what
the modern alcohol laws should look like. SB 9 is the best work
of 120 different stakeholders from public health, law
enforcement, and the wholesalers, retailers, and manufacturers
in the alcohol industry. He said modernization is critical for
the industry, as is streamlining licensing, and enhancing the
privileges of craft breweries. He encouraged the committee to
move the bill.
1:34:17 PM
ROBIN MINARD, MatSu Health Foundation, Wasilla, Alaska, stated
that the foundation supports SB 9 because it represents a
multiyear, multi-stakeholder partnership with the alcohol
industry to promote the responsible use of alcohol by adults,
reduce underage consumption, support better enforcement of
Alaska's alcohol laws, and have a healthy industry. She thanked
the committee and asked that they move the bill forward because
it has health benefits for all Alaskans.
1:36:00 PM
EVAN WOOD, Co-owner and Co-founder, Devils Club Brewery, Juneau,
Alaska, agreed with previous testimony that it has been a long
journey to arrive at SB 9. He said it is a rare opportunity to
have all the stakeholders on the same page in support of the
legislation in its current form. The past year has been onerous
and he believes that passing the bill in an expedited manner
would be alleviating for the industry.
1:37:32 PM
SARAH OATS, President, Alaska Cabaret Hotel Restaurant and
Retailers Association (CHARR), Anchorage, Alaska, stated that
Alaska CHARR is the state's trade association that represents
many of the 2000 liquor licenses statewide. She said that after
many years, stakeholders reached consensus on a thoughtful draft
of alcohol regulatory reform. There was agreement among public
health, public safety, state and municipal regulatory bodies,
and the three industry tiers. SB 9 captures that consensus.
MS. OATS said Alaska CHARR fully supports SB 9 and urges the
committee to pass the legislation, which will provide long-term
regulatory certainty. She described the impact the pandemic has
had on the industry and emphasized that SB 9 provides the
opportunity to move forward with a better regulatory system and
for Alaska's second largest industry to thrive. The changes
include the penalty modifications for violations to ensure fair
and consistent enforcement of alcohol laws; expedited
application processes; and statutes that make it easy for
industry members to understand their legal privileges,
restrictions, and expectations.
1:40:34 PM
TIFFANY HALL, Recover Alaska, Anchorage, Alaska, stated that for
many years Recover Alaska has worked hand in hand with other
public health and safety proponents, all levels of the alcohol
industry, as well as local, municipal and community leaders.
She cited data to show that Alaska struggles with many problems
associated with alcohol. Alaskans die at rates three times the
national average and alcohol costs the state $2.4 billion, 709
million of which is lost productivity. Other costs include
health care, criminal justice, traffic collisions, and social
services.
MS. HALL said Recover Alaska supports SB 9 for its positive
health and safety provisions that are largely evidenced-based
practices. These practices will work to reduce underage
drinking, increase public safety by reducing alcohol related
violence and crime, and will reduce alcohol related deaths.
Further, the bill will provide clarity and education for the
Alcohol and Marijuana Control Office and licensees, which will
make it easier for everyone to follow and enforce Title 4 laws.
She said all stakeholders can agree on this bill.
1:42:46 PM
JEANNE REILLY, Reilly's Irish Pub, Anchorage, Alaska, stated
that the industry has come together with the Brewers Guild and
the beverage dispensary licensees in a fantastic compromise
after many years of debate. She voiced support and hope that the
bill would move forward.
1:43:50 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO closed public testimony on SB 9 after discerning
that nobody else wished to comment.
SENATOR STEVENS asked the sponsor to remind the committee what
SB 9 does to control substance abuse.
SENATOR MICCICHE answered that the bill will help by clarifying
the way licensees operate and by providing funding for
additional enforcement. Under current law, many infractions that
are misdemeanors are neither enforced nor prosecuted. SB 9
changes those infractions to violations with an associated fine.
The penalty is immediate and does not require extensive court
time. The bill also links the license holder to the violation
when a server overserves somebody or serves a minor. Along with
this, there is funding for education so licensees know how to
comply with the rules. He noted that part of the education
outreach includes the new marijuana rules.
CHAIR COSTELLO found no further questions and solicited a
motion.
1:46:42 PM
SENATOR REVAK moved to report SB 9, work order 32-LS0124\B, from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s).
1:46:54 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO found no objection and SB 9 passed from the
Senate Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.
1:47:04 PM
At ease
1:48:57 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO reconvened the meeting and invited the sponsor to
make closing remarks.
SENATOR MICCICHE said many people worked on this bill and
significantly improved it in the process. He thanked the
committee for moving the bill and for the help in past years to
improve the bill.
SB 88-STATE INSUR. CATASTROPHE RESERVE ACCT.
1:49:53 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO.
88, "An Act relating to the state insurance catastrophe reserve
account; and providing for an effective date."
She listed the individuals available to answer questions and
stated the intent is to hear the introduction and hold the bill.
1:50:38 PM
At ease
1:52:26 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO reconvened the meeting and asked Mr. Jordan to
present SB 88.
1:52:43 PM
SCOTT JORDAN, Director, Division of Risk Management, Department
of Administration (DOA), Juneau, Alaska, delivered a PowerPoint
to present SB 88. He displayed highlighted portions of Sec.
37.05.289, the Catastrophe Reserve Account (CATFund) that was
enacted in FY88. The key points are that the fund was
established to cover unanticipated costs related to the state's
self-insurance program; the fund has a $5 million cap; and no
more than $5 million may be retained in the fund.
MR. JORDAN turned to the list of expenditures from the CATFund
since its inception. Over the last 33 years, the state has spent
approximately $149 million from the fund, or about $4.5 million
per year. He noted that the chart has several columns but he was
focusing on the column showing Total Expended on the far right.
He turned to the chart and line graph of the 10-year history of
property premiums and/or losses from FY10-FY20. The Property
Premiums column, highlighted in blue, reflects a little more
than $2 million paid in FY 10 and $5.1 million in FY 20. He
referred to the line graph on the right. It shows a sharp
increase from FY 11 to FY 12 and another market driven increase
in FY 18 and FY 19. He explained that the hardening reflects a
lack of capacity in the global market to pay catastrophic claims
and this causes premiums to rise.
MR. JORDAN directed attention to the Property Losses column
highlighted in orange. It reflects about $13 million in property
losses that the CATFund paid over the same 10-year period. The
line graph is relatively flat except for the $4 million loss due
to the fire at the Crystal Lake Hatchery in March 2014. The
subsequent spike in FY 20 was due to $1.26 million paid in
claims from the November 30, 2018 earthquake in Anchorage and
the $1 million payment when a DOTPF maintenance shop in McGrath
collapsed from snow load.
1:56:44 PM
MR. JORDAN turned to the charts on slide 4 and explained that he
included them to show all the expenses that go along with the
premiums the state pays for excess insurance. The top chart
reflects $39 million in property premiums from FY 10 to FY 20.
The lower chart reflects a little over $80 million paid for
aviation, marine, property, and bonds. He noted that property
premiums are about half of overall premium payments each year.
MR. JODAN turned to slide 5 that lists the larger claims paid
out of the Catastrophic Reserve Account. These were:
head2right AMJS LeConte Grounding May 2004 $1.187
million
head2right F&G Crystal Lake Hatchery fire March 2014 $4.078
million
head2right Alaska Aerospace Kodiak Launch Facility
rocket explosion August 2014
$1.513 million
head2right PFAS claims starting in November 2017 $5.877
million
head2right Earthquake related claims November 2018
$1.263 million
1:58:12 PM
SENATOR STEVENS asked if he agreed that other insurance paid
much more than the state's $1.5 million payment for the rocket
explosion at the Kodiak launch facility.
MR. JORDAN agreed. He said the claim was about $34 million; the
state's insurer paid about $17 million and the launch customer
paid the other $17 million.
SENATOR STEVENS expressed appreciation for the explanation.
1:59:00 PM
MR. JORDAN turned to the Lapse Appropriations Summary on slide 6
that shows the funding for the Catastrophic Reserve Account. He
explained that any money that Risk Management has left at the
end of a fiscal year is swept into the CATFund. If that doesn't
fill the fund to the $5 million cap, they look to the UGF lapse
appropriation funds.
He restated that the purpose of SB 88 is to allow the state to
be self-insured for property coverage. The state already has a
good record of self-insuring for workers' compensation and
general liability and wants to add property coverage because
premiums increased 30 percent for FY 21 and the expectation is
that they will increase another 15 percent to 20 percent for FY
22. The $5.1 premium in FY 20 will be about $7.6 million in FY
22. Increasing the $5 million unencumbered cap on the CATFund to
$50 million unencumbered cap will allow the state to equal the
$50 million limit it can buy for catastrophic coverage from the
market. He described it as a safety net that will save the
additional $2.5 million the state currently pays for insurance
and allow better control over claims.
CHAIR COSTELLO said a sectional is not necessary.
2:02:24 PM
SENATOR REVAK asked how the division decided on the $50 million
cap.
MR. JORDAN said the market currently limits catastrophic
coverage to $50 million. The idea is for the state to step away
from the property market completely and self-insure.
CHAIR COSTELLO asked the reason that he mentioned coverage for
earthquakes and floods but not fires.
MR. JORDAN replied this would incorporate fire loss for state
buildings but the state historically has not had large fire
losses. The fund has been able to handle all the losses so far
except for earthquake and flood. The concern is a catastrophic
loss.
2:05:01 PM
SENATOR STEVENS asked if the fund covers state-owned buildings
like the Capitol.
MR. JORDAN answered yes; the fund covers all state-owned
property assets.
CHAIR COSTELLO asked what other states have for insurance caps.
MR. JORDAN replied it varies by state and runs the gamut but
because of the tremendous market increase, the trend is for
states to have self-insured programs.
CHAIR COSTELLO asked if the Division of Risk Management in
Department of Administration (DOA) interacts with the Division
of Insurance in the Department of Commerce, Community and
Economic Development (DCCED).
MR. JORDAN answered that he speaks with Director Wing-Heier
occasionally, but because the Catastrophic Reserve Account
(CATFund) is a self-insured program, there isn't a lot of
interaction.
2:07:27 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO referred to the language on page 1, lines 7-8
that talks about "an amount that the commissioner of
administration determines to be necessary". She asked if that
would be a formal communication so the legislature is aware of
the amount or if it would show up on a ledger.
MR. JORDAN replied the amount that the commissioner determines
is necessary comes from what the Division of Risk Management
says is needed to bring the CATFund up to the $5 million cap.
2:08:28 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO found no further questions and advised that she
would hold SB 88 for further consideration.
2:08:58 PM
At ease
SB 11-COMMUNITY PROPERTY TRUSTS
2:10:31 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 11, "An Act relating to
community property and to community property trusts; and
providing for an effective date."
2:11:01 PM
SENATOR TOM BEGICH, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska,
Sponsor of SB 11, (via Teams), stated that SB 11 is similar to
Senate Bill 91 that former Senator John Coghill introduced in
the last legislature. He agreed to reintroduce the legislation
when he realized that it clarifies the meaning of "increment
appreciation" as intended by legislation passed in 1997. That
was House Bill 199 and the sponsor was Representative Joe Ryan.
He quoted testimony from 1997 that described the basis of the
value of an asset when a partner dies.
Any appreciation of that on behalf of the estate of
the person who died has no tax liability.
He emphasized that the original legislation recognized
appreciation in the valuation of assets in an estate and SB 11
clarifies that and corrects the ambiguous interpretation of the
original law.
2:14:38 PM
At ease
2:15:16 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO reconvened the meeting and asked Ms. Hahn to
continue her testimony.
2:15:22 PM
BRIX HAHN, Staff, Senator Tom Begich, sponsor of SB 11, Alaska
State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, read the following sponsor
statement for SB 11 into the record: [Original punctuation
provided.]
Alaska is a state with favorable trust laws, and
beneficial laws for community property ownership
between spouses. The state allows for "opt in"
community property ownership between married
couples. Community property ownership can provide
tremendous tax advantages to these couples. In
Alaska, residents and nonresidents alike can enter
into Alaska community property trust agreements. These
agreements benefit the individuals entering them, the
trust industry of Alaska, banks that hold associated
deposits, and through revenues generated by the
formation of a new trust, the state.
Community property is simply a way to own joint
property. A common way to enter into a community
property agreement is with your spouse. Each party
must elect into this agreement and the agreement
provides, most commonly, equal ownership and
management of specific property.
Currently, community property has a significant tax
advantage. When your spouse dies, community property
is placed into a tax category that allows for tax
advantages when the property in question is sold. To
realize these advantages, appreciation and income in a
trust must be characterized as community property.
The default rule has been that appreciation and income
on community property will be characterized as
community property, unless specifically declared in a
community property trust. Trust attorneys have
attested to this interpretation, but recent court
rulings have created an ambiguous understanding of
this general norm. This legislation is consistent with
industry understandings of trusts and seeks to clearly
define community property to include appreciation and
income on community property.
Senate Bill 11 establishes a clear definition of
appreciation and income on community property, as
intended by original drafters and The Community
Property Trust Act. This bill also has a retroactive
effective date of May 23, 1998.
2:17:45 PM
MS. HAHN presented the sectional analysis for SB 11.
Section 1.
Clarifies AS 34.77.030(h), by affirming legal intent
to ensure appreciation and income in community
property trusts are in fact community property unless
expressly otherwise stated in legal trust documents.
Section 2.
Provides that AS 34.77.030(h) is retroactive to
community property trust agreements entered into after
May 23, 1998 and defines "community property trust"
consistent with statute.
Section 3.
Adds as a new uncodified law of the State of Alaska, a
savings clause and asserts that Sec. 2 of this act
does not impact court actions or proceedings that
began before the effective date, or a community
property rights accrued before the effective date.
Section 4.
Adds as a new uncodified law of the State of Alaska
retroactivity to AS 34.77.030(h).
Section 5.
Establishes retroactivity through May 23, 1998.
2:18:43 PM
At ease
2:19:15 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO reconvened the meeting and moved to invited
testimony
2:19:33 PM
DAVE SHAFTEL, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, stated that
SB 11 corrects a long-standing problem in the statutes that has
become a trap for the unwary when drafting community property
trusts. He reminded the members that the tax purpose is that
when one spouse dies, both halves of the community property
basis step up to the fair market value. He said this unusual
rule applies only to community property states and it keys on
appreciation of the property being the default rule.
2:23:17 PM
MR. SHAFTEL said unfortunately the 1998 act was drafted to
create the opposite default rule and appreciation is not
included as part of the community property. Over the last 20
years, many attorneys have said in the trust document that
appreciation is part of the community property, but some have
been unaware and appreciation is not included as part of the
community property. He characterized SB 11 as a correction of a
drafting error to make appreciation part of Alaska's Community
Property Act.
2:25:40 PM
SENATOR STEVENS asked if this includes investments held as
community property.
MR. SHAFTEL answered yes; it includes any type of property held
as community property.
SENATOR STEVENS commented that it appears that the bill would be
advantageous to all people, not just the wealthy.
MR. SHAFTEL replied it is important to anyone who wants to own
property jointly and take advantage of reducing income tax for
the surviving spouse.
CHAIR COSTELLO asked if the bill would increase the estate tax
liability.
MR. SHAFTEL answered no.
2:28:08 PM
MATHEW BLATTMACHR, Peak Trust Company, Anchorage, Alaska, stated
agreement with the previous testimony. He said this is a widely
used financial planning technique for Alaskans. The original
intent of the Community Property Act was to include appreciation
and income and SB 11 clarifies that original intent. He
encouraged the committee to support the bill.
CHAIR COSTELLO noted who was available to answer questions.
Finding no questions, she thanked the sponsor.
2:29:39 PM
CHAIR COSTELLO held SB 11 for future consideration.
2:30:45 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Senator Costello adjourned the Senate Labor and Commerce
Standing Committee meeting at 2:30 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 9 Fiscal Note ACS.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| SB 9 Opposition Mat-Su Borough.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 9 |
| SB 88 v. A.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 88 |
| SB 88 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 88 |
| SB 88 v. A Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 88 |
| SB 88 Fiscal Note 1.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 88 |
| SB 88 Presentation 3.12.21.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 88 |
| SB 11 v. I.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 v. I Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Supreme Court Phillips Decision.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Supporting Document LISI Article.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Supporting Document Community Property Trust Act.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Fiscal Note ACS.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Letter of Support Cavaliere Law Firm.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Letter of Support Foley & Pearson.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Letter of Support McNabb Law.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Letter of Support OConnor Law.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Letter of Support Peak Trust Company.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Letter of Support Shaftel Delman.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 Letter of Support Stephen Greer.pdf |
SL&C 3/12/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 11 |