Legislature(2025 - 2026)SENATE FINANCE 532

04/09/2025 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= SB 39 LOANS UNDER $25,000; PAYDAY LOANS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 39(FIN) Out of Committee
+ SB 64 ELECTIONS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
+ SB 92 CORP. INCOME TAX; OIL & GAS ENTITIES TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Invited & Public Testimony --
+= HB 56 APPROP: SUPP; FUND CAP; CAP; AMENDING TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled but Not Heard
Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled:
+= SB 113 APPORTION TAXABLE INCOME;DIGITAL BUSINESS TELECONFERENCED
Moved SB 113 Out of Committee
**Streamed live on AKL.tv**
SENATE BILL NO. 39                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     "An Act  relating to loans  in an amount of  $25,000 or                                                                    
     less; relating  to the Nationwide  Multistate Licensing                                                                    
     System  and  Registry;  relating  to  deferred  deposit                                                                    
     advances; and providing for an effective date."                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
9:10:02 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR FOREST DUNBAR,  SPONSOR, introduced the legislation,                                                                    
which  involved regulations  for  payday lending  businesses                                                                    
imposing  a   36  percent  cap  and   removing  the  current                                                                    
exemption.  He continued  that Alaska  would  join 19  other                                                                    
states that established  the 36 percent APR  cap. There were                                                                    
also federal  laws that prevented businesses  from targeting                                                                    
loans for service members and their families.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
LIZ HARPOLD, STAFF, SENATOR DONNY  OLSON, explained that the                                                                    
bill sponsor had  submitted a couple of changes  to the bill                                                                    
that would be incorporated  into a Committee Substitute (CS)                                                                    
that  the committee  would consider.  The changes  clarified                                                                    
that  pawnbroker business  activities,  unrelated to  payday                                                                    
loans,  were exempt  from the  legislation; and  that mutual                                                                    
savings banks were  not affected by the  legislation as they                                                                    
were already governed by existing statutes.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman MOVED  to ADOPT  the committee  substitute                                                                    
for  SB   39,  Work   Draft  34-LS0357\I.  There   being  NO                                                                    
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Stedman  asked  for clarification  from  the  bill                                                                    
sponsor. He  did not think  the bill was time  sensitive but                                                                    
wanted to make sure members  understood the impacts of loans                                                                    
that were  up to $25,000.  He thought the committee  had not                                                                    
spent much  time discussing  larger loans  with accumulating                                                                    
interest charges. He wanted to  understand the impact on the                                                                    
marketplace. He  understood that  commercial banks  were not                                                                    
in the  market with the  smaller loans and wanted  to ensure                                                                    
there was still access.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Hoffman  noted that there were  three people online                                                                    
to answer questions.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
9:14:13 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Dunbar understood  that  in other  states that  had                                                                    
passed  such   legislation,  there  were   more  traditional                                                                    
lending institutions  that would fill the  gap. The entities                                                                    
that had done  the rollover had done very  small amounts. He                                                                    
thought there  was a  letter of  support from  a traditional                                                                    
lender in  the state,  which indicated that  it did  want to                                                                    
service  a  portion of  the  market.  He discussed  personal                                                                    
experience  with taking  out  a  relatively short-term  loan                                                                    
from  a traditional  lender. He  thought there  were profits                                                                    
from traditional lenders in the  space. He mentioned a study                                                                    
referenced by Senator Kiehl at  the last bill hearing, which                                                                    
had compared  individuals on  the edge  of qualifying  for a                                                                    
loan. It was  found that the individuals  that qualified for                                                                    
the  loan  were more  likely  to  default  on the  loan.  He                                                                    
concluded that those that took  out the loan had damage from                                                                    
the product and became more  vulnerable than if they had not                                                                    
taken out the loan.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator Kiehl  MOVED to REPORT  CSSB 39(FIN)  from committee                                                                    
with  individual recommendations  and attached  fiscal note.                                                                    
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CSSB 39(FIN)  was REPORTED out  of committee with  three "do                                                                    
pass"  recommendations, four  "no recommendations";  and one                                                                    
new fiscal  note from the Department  of Commerce, Community                                                                    
and Economic Development.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:17:19 AM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:19:07 AM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 39 03.26.25 SFIN Follow-Up to 03.20.25 Hearing.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Sectional Analysis version N 2.25.2025.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Sponsor Statement Version N 2.25.2025.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Summary of Changes Version N 2.25.2025.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Supporting Documents.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Letters of Opposition 2.25.2025.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Letters of Support 2.25.2025.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 OLA - Alaska Comment Letter.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Hudson Cook Testimony.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Opposition Testimony ILPA AK.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Miller Testimony 2025.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 AFSA comment letter - AK SB 39 rate caps 03.20.2025.pdf SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 2025 03 31 OLA Ltr re SB 39 Testimony Inaccuracies.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 Watson Testimony.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 CRL Written Response re AK SB 39.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 INFiN AK Statement.3.20.25.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 mark up rate calculation TILA.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 64 Summary of Changes I to W 4.2.2025.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 64
SB 64 Sponsor Statement version W 4.2.2025.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 64
SB 64 Sectional Analysis version W 4.2.2025.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 64
SB 64 Letters of Opposition 3.26.25.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 64
SB 64 Letters of Support 3.26.25.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 64
SB 92 DOR Presentation to SRES.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SRES 4/2/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 92
SB 92 Email DOR to SRES Staff 3.11.25 re DOR Response to Questions.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Email DOR to Senators 3.4.25 re Meeting Follow Up & Docs.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SRES 4/2/2025 3:30:00 PM
SB 92
Legislative Research on S-Corps in Other States.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
Hilcorp - Where We Operate.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Invited Testimony Presentation - CPA Tax Analysis Slides $10B.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Wuestenfeld.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Presentation to Senate Finance 4.9.25.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Fiscal Note DOR - OLD NOTE.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Sectional Analysis v.S SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Public Testimony.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Legislative Research Alaska Business Entities and Taxation.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 IRS Qualified Business Income Deduction.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 IRS 2024 Form 6251.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Historical Documents Provided by (S)RES.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 DOR Presentation to SRES.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Long.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Demers.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Griswold.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Maurer.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Faust.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Brown.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Baily.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Martin.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Allmeroth.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 39 Explanation of Changes ver. N to ver. I April 7 2025.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 work draft version I.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 113 3-24-25 CTIA Alaska SB 113 Letter.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 113 Banuelos Testimony.pdf SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 113 Public Testimony Allmeroth.pdf SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 113 Research - CCH AnswersConnect - Market Based Sourcing.pdf SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 113 Sponsor Statement version A 2.26.25.pdf SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 113 Sectional Analysis version A 2.26.25.pdf SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 113 Research - CCH AnswersConnect - Apportionment Formulas.pdf SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 113 Research Tax Division 2024 Annual Report excerpt.pdf SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 39 2025 04 07 OLA Letter to Sen Kaufman re SB 39.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 39 RBFC AK SB 39 Opposition Letter.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 113 Public Testimony.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 113
SB 64 OOG DOE 040425.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 64
SB 92 Explanation of Changes v.L to v.S.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Sectional Analysis v.S.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Sponsor Statement.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 39 RBFC AK SB 39 Opposition Letter (2).pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 39
SB 64 2025.4.8 NM SB 64 Letter of Support.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 64
SB 92 Testimony Fredeen.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 testimony Stead.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Support Letter 4_02_25.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Droop.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Schmidt.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Rennolds.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimoy Kandror.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 – Opposition Carlstrom.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 Testimony Stokes.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92
SB 92 citizen testimony.pdf SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM
SB 92