Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
04/12/2017 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB208 | |
| HB175 | |
| HB170 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 170 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 200 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 208 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 175 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 223 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 170-AK SECURITIES ACT; PENALTIES; CRT. RULES
3:44:55 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 170, "An Act relating to securities,
registration, exempt securities, exempt transactions, broker-
dealers, agents, investment advice, investment advisers,
investment adviser representatives, federal covered securities,
federal covered investment advisers, viatical settlement
interests, small intrastate security offerings, Canadian broker-
dealers, and Canadian agents; relating to administrative, civil,
and criminal enforcement provisions, including restitution and
civil penalties for violations; relating to an investor training
fund; establishing increased civil penalties for harming older
persons and vulnerable adults; relating to corporations
organized under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act;
amending Rules 4, 5, 54, 65, and 90, Alaska Rules of Civil
Procedure, and Rule 602, Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure;
and providing for an effective date."
3:45:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX moved to adopt Amendment 1, Version 30-
LS0333\J.2, Bannister, 4/10/17, which read as follows:
Page 34, lines 18 - 19:
Delete "by a governmental authority"
REPRESENTATIVE FANSLER objected for purposes of discussion.
3:45:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX explained that the amendment deletes the
phrase "by a governmental authority" because, she opined, there
should be a description of any pending litigation action or
proceeding that materially affects the issuer's business or
assets, whether or not it was contemplated by a governmental
entity, or anyone.
REPRESENTATIVE FANSLER withdrew his objection.
3:46:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected for purposes of discussion, and
noted that he was not sure he understood exactly how expansive
it would be when removing that language. He offered a scenario
of making a motion to change a bylaw for his political party,
and asked how he draws that barrier to make sure it's not too
expansive.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX responded that if someone sent
Representative Eastman a letter that read, "Dear David, We're
going to sue you, and we're going to sue you for $1 million."
In that scenario, if Representative Eastman was a billion dollar
entity being sued for $1 million, possibly it would be no big
deal, but if $1 million was other than chump change to
Representative Eastman, it would materially affect his business
or assets.
3:47:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether there was some other part
of this chapter that had the word "legal" before the word
"action" so that an action must be a legal action.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX referred to the first portion of Sec.
45.56.310(b)(12). Securities registration by qualification,
which read as follows:
(12) a description of any pending
litigation, action, or proceeding ...
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX advised that this is boiler plate
language.
3:47:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN withdrew his objection. There being no
further objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
[CHAIR CLAMAN passed gavel to Vice Chair Fansler.]
3:48:06 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN moved to adopt Amendment 2, Version 30-LS0333\J.1,
Bannister, 4/11/17, which read as follows:
Page 1, line 5, following "agents;":
Insert "relating to protecting older and
vulnerable adults from financial exploitation;"
Page 62, line 12, following "a":
Insert "broker-dealer, investment adviser, or"
Page 62, line 14:
Following "the":
Insert "broker-dealer, investment adviser, or"
Delete "promptly"
Page 62, line 15, following "administrator":
Insert "not later than five days after the
broker-dealer, investment adviser, or qualified
individual develops the reasonable belief that the
financial exploitation or attempted financial
exploitation has or may have occurred, or is being
attempted, except that the broker-dealer, investment
adviser, or qualified individual shall notify adult
protective services and the administrator immediately
upon confirmation of the financial exploitation or
attempted financial exploitation of the covered adult"
Page 62, lines 16 - 19:
Delete all material and insert:
"(b) The requirements of (a) of this section may
not be construed to require more than one notification
for each occurrence of exploitation or attempted
exploitation."
Page 62, line 20, following the first occurrence of
"a":
Insert "broker-dealer, investment adviser, or"
Page 62, line 21, following "a":
Insert "broker-dealer, investment adviser, or"
Page 62, line 22, following "adult":
Insert "previously"
Page 62, line 23:
Following "adult,":
Insert "as well as any other person allowed under
state or federal law or regulation, or the rules of a
self-regulatory organization,"
Following the second occurrence of "the":
Insert "broker-dealer, investment adviser, or"
Page 62, lines 26 - 28:
Delete all material.
Reletter the following subsections accordingly.
Page 63, line 9:
Delete the second occurrence of "person"
Insert "individual"
Page 63, line 16:
Delete "results"
Insert "status"
Page 63, line 17, following "administrator":
Insert ", and provides additional status updates
to the administrator and adult protective services
upon request"
Page 63, line 18:
Delete "(e)"
Insert "(d)"
Page 63, line 31:
Delete "(e), (f), or (g)"
Insert "(d) or (e)"
Page 64, line 2:
Delete "person"
Insert "adult"
Page 64, lines 4 - 7:
Delete all material.
Reletter the following subsections accordingly.
Page 64, following line 18:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(h) A broker-dealer, investment adviser, or
qualified individual acting in good faith and
exercising reasonable care under (a) - (g) of this
section is immune from administrative or civil
liability for a notification, disclosure, disbursement
delay, or record sharing under (a) - (g) of this
section."
Reletter the following subsections accordingly.
Page 65, line 12:
Delete "investment adviser,"
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP objected for purposes of discussion.
3:48:25 PM
KEVIN ANSELM, Director, Division of Banking and Securities,
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development,
explained that the Division of Banking and Securities worked
with the industry to create this amendment so the bill would
work better for its business practices, and was clearer for the
community. This amendment, in and of itself, protects elder and
vulnerable Alaskans by requiring the financial industry to
report when it believed that financial exploitation was about to
take place, or had taken place. It allows the financial
industry to hold onto a disbursement regarding a securities
trade, for instance, until it was determined there was, or was
not, exploitation, she explained. She noted that the two
reporting pieces include the Administrator of Securities,
Division of Banking and Securities, Department of Commerce,
Community & Economic Development (DCCED), and also the Adult
Protective Services (APS), Division of Senior and Disabilities
Services, Department of Health and Social Services. She offered
that in the event those reports are made, the industry, the
stockbroker, investment advisor, the advisor's firm, are granted
administrative and civil immunity from violation of the act.
Immunity is a large piece for industry, she described, and the
industry works together with the division to resolve the issue.
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP withdrew his objection. There being no
objection, Amendment 2 was adopted.
3:50:03 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN moved to adopt Amendment 3, Version 30-LS0333\J.4,
Bannister, 4/12/17, which read as follows:
Page 92, lines 13 - 15:
Delete ", a regulation adopted under this
chapter, or an order issued under this chapter, except
AS 45.56.550 or the notice filing requirements of
AS 45.56.330 or 45.56.445,"
Page 92, lines 16 - 18:
Delete "A person convicted of violating a
regulation or order issued under this chapter may be
fined, but may not be imprisoned, if the person did
not know of the regulation or order."
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected for purposes of discussion.
3:51:08 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN explained that Amendment [3] was in response to the
in-depth and extended discussion during the last bill hearing
with regard to criminal violations and issues. He reminded the
committee that the concerns expressed involved having a charge
that did not include a mental state, and questions about whether
it did, or did not, actually create a misdemeanor. During the
course of the discussions, the Department of Law offered a
potential amendment to delete [Sec. 45.56.670(a), page 92, lines
13-15] to read as follows:
(a) ... , a regulation adopted under this
chapter, or an order issued under this chapter, except
AS 45.56.550 or the notice filing requirements of AS
45.56.330 or 45.56.445.
CHAIR CLAMAN explained that deleting the language regarding
regulations and orders would not only be satisfactory with the
Department of Law, but it would make the last sentence of Sec.
45.56.670(a), lines 16-18 superfluous because it related to
regulations and orders. In adopting Amendment 3, he further
explained, the language would be more consistent with
traditional criminal provisions, and there would not be the
issue of regulations that might create a crime that the
legislature had not created.
3:52:38 PM
MS. ANSELM advised that the Department of Commerce, Community &
Economic Development has no objection to Amendment 3.
3:52:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked the exact effect this amendment
would have on violations of notice filing requirements, and
whether that would increase the penalties for someone merely
making a notice filing requirement violation.
CHAIR CLAMAN opined that this narrows it, as opposed to the
range of regulations that could be issued that one would have to
show knowledge. Under this amendment, the only issue that could
be a basis for a criminal charge would be violations of the
statutes. He explained that when "they reference violates this
chapter" means Alaska Statutes within Chapter 45, and they would
have to show "knowing violation" of those statutes, rather than
violations of regulations or orders. It actually narrows the
scope of conduct that could be subject to criminal charges, he
said.
3:54:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN noted that currently AS 45.56.330 and
45.56.445 include notice filing requirements, and they are
currently exempted because there is [page 92, line 14] "except
... or." In the event that exemption was removed, and those are
included within this chapter, he paraphrased, "A person who
intentionally violates this chapter, including these notice
filing requirements is guilty of a class C felony" [page 92,
lines 12-15]. He asked whether the intent of the committee is
that a simple notice filing requirement violation would now be a
felony under Amendment 3.
CHAIR CLAMAN related that he did not follow Representative
Eastman's question.
3:55:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP asked, in explaining Representative
Eastman's question, the committee to turn to Sec. 46.56.550, and
he pointed out that it currently exempts this as being a felony,
and paraphrased, "filing of sales and advertising literature."
Under Amendment 3, he explained, it takes out this section
dealing with advertising to clients and the proper manner in
which to advertise. It also removes the filing requirements
under AS 45.56.330 and 45.56.445, as those are specifically
exempted from being felonies. Representative Eastman had asked
whether the intent of the committee was to now make those
felonies because the amendment pulls out the exceptions and by
default would fall into felony territory.
3:56:46 PM
RENEE WARDLAW, Assistant Attorney General, Commercial and Fair
Business Section, Department of Law, [audio difficulties]
responded that excluding the following language in the
amendment, and paraphrased, "except AS 45.56.550, or the notice
filing requirements of AS 45.56.330 or 45.56.445" means that a
violation of those statutes could result in a class C felony.
3:57:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX commented that she agrees with
Representative Eastman and possibly with Ms. Wardlaw, although
she was unsure [due to audio difficulties]. Representative
LeDoux advised that she had to leave the meeting but would like
to see an amendment to Amendment 3.
REPRESENTATIVE FANSLER commented that there was no suggestion
from Ms. Wardlaw, other than her confirmation that
Representative Eastman's point was correct.
3:58:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KOPP moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 3, for the purpose of not "felonizing" conduct that
would become a felony, which is not currently a felony. In
order to be consistent moving forward, he suggested that this
amendment would keep everything as currently excepted from a
felony prosecution, the same as it is currently. In reference
to amending Amendment 3, to simply delete [page 1] line 3,
"except AS 45.56.550 or the notice filing requirements of AS
45.56.330 or 45.56.445."
REPRESENTATIVE FANSLER surmised that Conceptual Amendment 1 to
Amendment 3 deletes line 3, "except AS 45.56.550 or the notice
filing requirements of AS 45.56.330 or 45.56.445."
CHAIR CLAMAN noted he would like input from Ms. Anselm and Ms.
Wardlaw as to Conceptual Amendment 1.
MS. ANSELM commented that the Department of Commerce, Community
& Economic Development is fine with Conceptual Amendment 1, and
asked that Ms. Wardlaw speak to the conceptual amendment.
MS. WARDLAW advised that the Department of Law has no objection
to Conceptual Amendment 1.
CHAIR CLAMAN, as maker of the amendment, advised he has no
objection to Conceptual Amendment 1. He commented that,
interestingly, by deleting "the last sentence of the amendment,"
the committee was keeping that language in the bill.
Consequently, there was a bit of a mirror effect, but he had no
objection, he said.
REPRESENTATIVE FANSLER noted there being no objection,
Conceptual Amendment 1 to Amendment 3 was adopted.
4:02:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN withdrew his objection to Amendment 3.
There being no objection, Amendment 3, as amended, was adopted.
[VICE CHAIR FANSLER returned the gavel to Chair Claman.]
4:02:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN referred to Amendment 1, noting that the
committee removed the parameter that "contemplated as yet
unexecuted litigation actions or proceedings by a governmental
authority." He asked Ms. Wardlaw, whether it was clear, with
this amendment now going forward in the bill, exactly what types
of proceedings would be wrapped up in this which were not
previously included.
MS. WARDLAW responded that the amendment actually expands legal
proceedings beyond governmental agencies to include other
parties, and at this time the Department of Law has no objection
to Representative LeDoux's amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN clarified that his question was, what it
now includes because the word "contemplated" remains, which
means it has not yet happened. He asked what sorts of
contemplated things haven't happened yet, actions, proceedings,
and such, which now fall under the scope of this statute.
MS. WARDLAW answered that "contemplated" would be inclusive of
any proceedings that had not yet occurred, such as something
under consideration by "this agency," and was not yet at the
point of filing a complaint.
CHAIR CLAMAN referred to "governmental authority" and explained
that it was fairly common, especially in securities settings,
for an entity "regulated by these" to receive a letter from the
government advising the person they made some errors. The
government's "demand letter," or a private entity's demand
letter, serves as putting the person on notice that within 30,
60 days, or whatever time period, if the person had not fixed
the errors, the government may file civil or criminal action
with regard to the violation, or the private entity may file a
civil lawsuit. He explained that an entity must take
affirmative action in the form of the demand letter giving a
party notice that a lawsuit may be filed, in private as well as
public actions.
MS. WARDLAW advised that Chair Claman was correct.
4:07:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN referred to [Sec. 45.56.670(a), page 92],
lines 16-17, and commented that it was simply saying that it is
any proceeding to which the issuer is a party. He said that the
issuer could be on either side of the action because it did not
appear to be limited in any manner. He then referred to line
18, and paraphrased, "any contemplated proceeding," and asked
whether the language here limits this so that it only applies
when the party is on the receiving end of a litigation action or
a proceeding was being contemplated. He further asked whether
it would not apply in a case not yet filed wherein someone was
going the other direction where proprietary information might be
involved, i.e., the fact that they are about to file the
lawsuit, and obviously if the lawsuit had not yet been filed
there was probably a reason.
MS. ANSELM responded "No, it does not affect that," and
explained that this is for a registration by qualification which
is used in many states. The intent, she explained, is that it
does not matter whether a party was on the receiving side or the
promulgation side of situation, it needs to be disclosed because
if a party is being sued or is suing another party, "it can
affect what the value of the securities are, and it should be
disclosed."
4:09:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked, to whom this information would go
to and whether there was adequate protection that no proprietary
information would be disclosed to the detriment of the party.
MS. ANSELM answered that when registrations come in, until they
are final, are considered proprietary, and the issuers are
allowed to point out to the division which pieces are
proprietary. She offered that it would be kept confidential
until it couldn't be kept confidential any longer, and depending
upon the situation, it may not be approved for sale in the State
of Alaska due to problems with a registration.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN questioned that if the information would
become public at some point, at what point does it become
public, and further questioned whether the fact that someone was
contemplating a lawsuit whether that would meet her
understanding of proprietary.
MS. ANSELM responded that "it would depend on what it was,"
typically, if there was a problem for the insurer in a
securities transaction, the issuer would withdraw the potential
offer of securities until the problem was resolved because that
is not something they want hanging out there. She pointed out
that investors, and the marketplace, do not like uncertainty;
therefore, the insurer would probably pull it back, get it
resolved, and then move forward. In the event it was a
sensitive matter, the insurer would ask the division to keep it
cloaked, and under the privacy pieces of the Securities Act, the
division can keep the information cloaked, or it can open an
investigation and cloak it in that manner.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether it would be cloaked
indefinitely.
MS. ANSELM answered that it would be cloaked indefinitely for an
investigation because those investigatory records are not
disclosable.
4:12:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FANSLER moved to report HB 170, Version 30-
LS0333\J, as amended, out of committee with individual
recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being
no objection, HB 170(JUD) moved from the House Judiciary
Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB208 ver A 4.10.17.PDF |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Sponsor Statement 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Sectional Analysis ver A 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 PowerPoint Sectional 4.10.17.pptx |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Supporting Document-Decanting Matrix 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Supporting Document-Decanting Rankings 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Supporting Document-Trust Estate Glossary 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Supporting Document-Letter Peak Trust Company 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Supporting Document-Letter Manley & Brautigam 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Supporting Document-Letter ABA 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Supporting Document-Letter Northern Law Group 4.10.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB208 Fiscal Note LAW-CIV 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 208 |
| HB175 ver A 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB175 Sponsor Statement 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB175 Sectional Analysis ver A 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB175 Additional Document-Legal Memo 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB175 Supporting Document-Supplemental Information 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB 175 Supporting Document-Letters of Support 4.11.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB 175 Opposing Document-Letters of Opposition 4.11.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB175 Additional Document-Letter on Congressional Consent 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB175 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 175 |
| HB170 ver J 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Sponsor Statement 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Sectional Analysis 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Repealers List 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 DCCED Whitepaper 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Supporting Document-Letter ANCSA Regional Association 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Supporting Document-Letter NASAA 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 HJUD Slide Presentation 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Additional Document-Enforcement Comparison Chart 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Additional Document-Sponsor's Reply to House Judiciary Committee Questions 4.11.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Additional Document-Violations in Statute 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Amendments #1-3 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Amendments #1-3 HJUD Final Votes 4.12.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Fiscal Note DCCED-DBS 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |
| HB170 Fiscal Note DHSS-SDSA 4.7.17.pdf |
HJUD 4/7/2017 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/11/2017 5:30:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2017 1:00:00 PM |
HB 170 |