Legislature(2023 - 2024)
2023-05-11 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2023-05-11 House Journal Page 1043 HB 28 The following was before the House: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 28(FIN) "An Act restricting the release of certain records of convictions; and providing for an effective date." Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative McCabe: Page 3, line 3: Delete "and" Page 3, line 4, following "records": Insert "; and (5) pays a fee established by the agency in regulation in an amount that is not less than $50" Representative McCabe moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Wright objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 28(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Allard, Carpenter, Eastman, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe, McKay, Rauscher, Saddler, Shaw, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance 2023-05-11 House Journal Page 1044 Nays: Armstrong, Carrick, Coulombe, Cronk, Dibert, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, McCormick, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Prax, Ruffridge, Schrage, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Sumner, Wright Absent: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was not offered. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, line 1, following "convictions;" (title amendment): Insert "relating to the information a defendant may provide to a prospective employer concerning the defendant's criminal history;" Page 2, line 26: Delete "a new subsection" Insert "new subsections" Page 3, following line 4: Insert a new subsection to read: "(g) Nothing in (f) of this section permits a defendant to provide a prospective employer inaccurate information concerning the defendant's criminal history." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Prax objected. Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 3. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative McCabe, citing section 403 of Mason's Manual, rose to a point of order regarding withdrawal of an amendment after formal introduction. 2023-05-11 House Journal Page 1045 The Speaker stated that the point was well taken. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 3, line 3, following "convicted of": Insert "or charged with" Page 3, line 14, following "convicted of": Insert "or charged with" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Wright objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 28(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 36 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Carpenter, Eastman, Stutes Nays: Armstrong, Carrick, Coulombe, Cronk, Dibert, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Sumner, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright Allard changed from "NAY" to "YEA" And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 28(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There was objection. CSHB 28(FIN) will advance to third reading on tomorrow's calendar.