2017-03-17                     House Journal                      Page 0664
Representative Tarr objected.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 126 be adopted?"  The                                                                 
roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 57(FIN) am                                                                                                                 
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 126                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  17   NAYS:  21   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Knopp, Kopp, LeDoux,                                                                  
Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler,                                                                           
Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Wilson                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn,                                                                          
Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins,                                                                
Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Claman, Thompson                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 126 was not adopted.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 127 was offered  by Representatives Eastman and                                                                    
Rauscher:                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Page 51, following line 6:                                                                                                      
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
     "(c)  It is the intent of the legislature that no state funds be used to                                                   
promote the creation or expansion of a borough where one does not                                                               
already exist unless residents in the affected jurisdiction have                                                                
expressed a desire to reside in a borough through a public vote on the                                                          
matter."                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Amendment No. 127 be adopted.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins objected.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 127 be adopted?"  The                                                                 
roll was taken with the following result: