Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2009-04-15 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2009-04-15 House Journal Page 0998 HB 222 Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HB 222(title am) (page 996). Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of HB 222(title am) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The following was again before the House in third reading: HOUSE BILL NO. 222(title am) "An Act prohibiting discrimination by health care insurers based on genetic information; providing special enrollment requirements related to Medicaid and state child health plan coverage; requiring a health care insurer to offer coverage for the treatment of alcoholism or drug abuse; providing continuity of coverage for college students during medically necessary leaves of absence from college; requiring health care insurers in the group market to provide parity in the application of mental health and substance abuse benefits that comply with federal requirements; amending the definition of 'dentist' to include out-of-state dentists for 2009-04-15 House Journal Page 0999 purposes of certain dental insurance requirements; and providing for an effective date." The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HB 222(title am) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 222(title am)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 29 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Joule, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Lynn, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Thomas, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Foster, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Keller, Kelly, Millett, Stoltze, Wilson Excused: Gatto And so, HB 222(title am) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 222(title am) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.