Legislature(1995 - 1996)
05/02/1996 03:26 PM Senate TRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
May 2, 1996
3:26 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Steve Rieger, Chairman
Senator Robin Taylor, Vice Chair
Senator Lyda Green
Senator Al Adams
Senator Georgianna Lincoln
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 526(FIN) am
"An Act relating to the financing authority, programs, operations,
and projects of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority; providing an exemption from the procurement code for
certain projects of the authority; and providing for an effective
date."
PREVIOUS SENATE ACTION
HB 526 - See Senate Transportation minutes dated 4/16/96, 4/23/96
& 4/26/96.
ACTION NARRATIVE
TAPE 96-22, SIDE A
Number 001
CSHB 526 AIDEA(FIN) am OPERATIONS/PROJECTS/LOANS
CHAIRMAN RIEGER called the Senate Transportation Committee meeting
to order at 3:26 p.m., and brought HB 526 before the committee. He
directed attention to a proposed SCS CSHB 526(TRA) version "R"
dated 5/1/96.
Number 012
SENATOR TAYLOR moved adoption of SCS CSHB 526(TRA) for purposes of
discussion. Hearing no objection, it was so ordered.
Number 020
CHAIRMAN RIEGER outlined the following changes made in the
Transportation SCS, which was before the committee:
(1) Section 1: The language in the House version "related to an
integrated transportation facility" has been changed to "made with
the developer of an integrated transportation."
(2) Section 2: The language is entirely new. Section 2 adds to
the Alaska Statutes a minimum formula for payment of a dividend to
the state each fiscal year. The amount of the dividend for a
fiscal year may not be less than 40 percent of the net income of
the authority for that fiscal year, unless that amount exceeds the
total unrestricted net income of the authority for that year, etc.
(3) Section 3: The issuance of bonds of greater than $10,000,000
to assist in the financing of a development project has been
reinstated, as well as adding a sunset date of July 1, 1998.
(4) Section 6: Language has been added describing the interest
rate on loans which are not purchased from borrowed funds, but
instead, purchased from the general assets of the authority. It
provides that if it is a tax exempt type of project, the rate would
be what it would have been if it were bonded at tax exempt rates
for that project. If it's a taxable type, it would be at the
taxable rates.
(5) Section 10: On page 5, line 13 the words "up to" were added
in language which refers to the guarantee of a loan. It gives the
flexibility to guarantee less than 80 percent.
(6) Section 13: On page 6, line 16 it was felt the language
"protection of the authority's interest" was too broad and that
has been changed to "protection of the authority's interest in a
loan or loan guarantee."
(7) Section 14: "Prime rate" has been further defined as the
United States prime rate.
(8) Section 18: The repealer of the Midrex authorization has been
changed to a modification of the Midrex language. Instead of
referencing the Midrex project, it references a bulk commodity
loading and shipping terminal, which may located anywhere within
Cook Inlet. This authorization would be subject to the ordinary
tests of feasibility that are elsewhere in the AIDEA statutes.
(9) Section 19: This is an extension of additional sunset
provisions in the bill to July 1, 1998 instead of repealing on July
1, 1996.
(10) Section 21: This is a repealer of the Business Assistance
Loan Guarantee program.
(11) Section 22: This is transition language that was added in
Senate State Affairs. There is new transition language on lines 10
through 12 referring to the dividend payment.
Number 112
CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if there was any testimony on SCS CSHB
526(TRA). Hearing none, he asked for the pleasure of the
committee.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved SCS CSHB 526(TRA) be passed out of committee
with individual recommendations. He commented that he would have
liked to see the Bradfield project in the bill, but it is his
understanding they will be able to do that through other authority,
if a feasible project is developed. Hearing no objection, the
Chairman stated the motion carried.
There being no further business to come before the committee, the
meeting was adjourned at 3:34 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|