Legislature(1995 - 1996)
05/05/1996 01:39 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
May 5, 1996
1:39 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Senator Robin Taylor, Chairman
Senator Lyda Green, Vice-Chairman
Senator Al Adams
MEMBERS ABSENT
Senator Mike Miller
Senator Johnny Ellis
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 19(title am)
"An Act amending the definition of `fault' as that term is used for
the purposes of determining the liabilities of parties in civil
actions; amending the definition of `fault' as it relates to
setting limitations on civil liability; and amending the definition
of `fault' as it relates to authorizing the award, in conformance
with applicable court rule, of attorney fees in civil actions."
CSHB 414(JUD) (MANDATORY MEDIATION/DESIGN PROF LAWSUITS) WAS
SCHEDULED BUT NOT TAKEN UP THIS DATE BY THE COMMITTEE.
PREVIOUS SENATE COMMITTEE ACTION
HB 19 - No previous action to record.
HB 414 - No previous action to record.
WITNESS REGISTER
Represenatative Gene Therriault
State Capitol
Juneau, AK 99801-1182
POSITION STATEMENT: Prime Sponsor of HB 19
Crystal Smith
Legal Administrator
Department of Law
P.O. Box 110300
Juneau, AK 99811-0300
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 19
ACTION NARRATIVE
TAPE 96-48, SIDE A
Number 001
HB 19(title am) DEFINITION OF "FAULT" FOR CIVIL LIABILITY
CHAIRMAN ROBIN TAYLOR called the Judiciary Committee meeting to
order at 1:39 p.m., and brought HB 19(title am) before the
committee.
Number 043
REPRESENTATIVE GENE THERRIAULT, prime sponsor of HB 414, said the
bill was introduced at the request of an assistant attorney general
who is one of his constituents and has dealt with a number of cases
where the argument has been advanced that a portion of fault or
damages cannot be apportioned to a person who commits an
intentional act. He noted that in Attorney General Botelho's memo
to the legislative leadership relating to the Kerr decision, he
indicated part of their concern over the state losing on appeal was
that the Supreme Court could rule, in fact, that that argument was
valid and the state would not be able to shift any of the fault to
the actual criminals in the mail bombing and would have to bear 100
percent of the fault itself.
SENATOR TAYLOR interjected that no court has held that yet, and
that it has been tried in front of several different courts, all of
whom rejected it as a silly argument. REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT
said because the courts have been ruling that way, they want to
clarify it so that bringing that argument as part of a defense is
extinguished, and any danger of losing on appeal and judgements
going up is also extinguished.
Number 075
SENATOR TAYLOR, speaking to the Kerr case, said what the jury and
the court did in that case was to follow the public's demand for
allocation of fault. They found that the criminals involved were
88 percent negligent and that the prison system was 12 percent
negligent, so 12 percent of Mrs. Kerr's medical bills, etc., will
be paid, but the other 88 percent will not. Prior to the tort
reform movement in 1986, she would have been paid 100 percent
because there was joint and several liability in this state. He
personally thinks Mrs. Kerr was deserving of the entire settlement,
but that didn't occur.
Number 109
CRYSTAL SMITH, Legal Administrator, Department of Law, stated the
department's support for HB 19.
Number 115
Because the committee had lost its quorum, it could not take any
action on HB 19. SENATOR TAYLOR stated the committee would recess
to a call of the chair until a quorum could be reestablished. The
meeting was recessed at 1:47 p.m.
[THE MEETING ON HB 19 WAS NOT RECONVENED BEFORE THE LEGISLATIVE
SESSION ADJOURNED ON MAY 7, 1996]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|