Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/27/1996 09:10 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 226
An Act relating to biennial registration of motor
vehicles; imposing biennial registration fees on motor
vehicles and authorizing a scheduled biennial municipal
tax on motor vehicles; relating to fees for motor
vehicle emissions control programs; and providing for
an effective date.
Co-chairman Halford directed that SB 226 be brought on for
discussion. Co-chairman Frank explained that the bill
represents an attempt to reduce the burden incurred by
annual vehicle registration by requiring biennial
registration. The department was planning to implement
biennial registration in Anchorage and Fairbanks. The Co-
chairman expressed his belief that it makes sense to do so
statewide. The legislation contains a slight price break in
that registration would cost $68.00 for two years rather
than $35.00 annually.
Senator Donley voiced support for the bill. He referenced
last year's passage of legislation providing for biennial
emission testing and noted ongoing discussion of testing
fees. He then asked that Senator Frank consider inclusion
of fee guidelines within SB 226. It appears the cities want
to double fees even though they are "only doing half as much
work." Sen Donley suggested it might be appropriate to place
a cap on fees. Fairbanks has established a $35.00 maximum
for tests while the maximum in Anchorage is $50.00. It
might be appropriate to set a consistent level to prevent
future abuses.
JUANITA HENSLEY, Chief, Driver Services, Division of Motor
Vehicles, Dept. of Public Safety, next came before
committee. She noted that vehicle registration is the
simplest transaction performed by the division. The state
presently contracts with 20 offices which perform vehicle
registration at the same time emission testing is done.
Vehicles may also be registered by mail. Mrs. Hensley
acknowledged that the department hoped to implement biennial
registration by July 1 to allow those who choose to license
for two years to do so. The proposed bill would make
biennial registration a requirement. Mrs. Hensley voiced
department support for the legislation.
Senator Randy Phillips noted that those who choose to
register in person, rather than through the mail, pay an
additional $10.00 fee and suggested that the proposed bill
might provide a remedy for problems associated with the
extra charge. Co-chairman Halford asked if the intent is to
provide a discount for mail renewal rather than a penalty
for registration at a division of motor vehicles' office.
Discussion followed regarding municipal motor vehicle taxes
collected by the division on behalf of municipalities. Mrs.
Hensley explained that municipalities which collect the
personal property tax themselves set the level of taxation.
If the municipality elects to have the division collect the
tax at the time of registration, the tax schedule is set by
statute. The emission test fee is set by the two
communities that require the test. The Dept. of
Environmental Conservation also sets a fee for
administration of the program. Co-chairman Frank asked that
Mrs. Hensley provide information on the state charge as well
as fees levied by Fairbanks and Anchorage municipalities.
Further discussion of certificate and test fees followed.
Co-chairman Frank voiced his understanding that fees were
intended to cover costs rather than to be applied as a tax.
Senator Rieger advised of his recollection that the fee in
Anchorage was intended to cover publicity at the outset of
the program.
Co-chairman Halford suggested that addition of language
relating to a discount for mail registration and a
limitation of emission test fees occur while the bill is in
committee rather than via floor amendment.
Senator Donley voiced concern regarding reductions to
division of motor vehicle offices contained in the
Governor's budget. He acknowledged that the division
generates greater revenue than it is given for operations.
He then reiterated support for the proposed bill, saying
that resulting reductions in revenues would not impact
division funding. He voiced further concern regarding cuts
that would eliminate enforcement of the financial
responsibility act because it directly serves needy Alaskans
who are innocently victimized in accidents. Senator Rieger
remarked that the $40.00 reduction in everyone's PFD
mentioned in discussion of SB 37 is comparable to the
increase that everyone purchasing insurance pays when
uninsured motorist coverage is added to policies because
Alaska still has the one free accident rule. A fix here
would benefit every Alaskan who purchases auto insurance.
END: SFC-96, #30, Side 2
BEGIN: SFC-96, #30-A, Side 1
Co-chairman Halford directed that SB 226 be held in
committee for subsequent discussion.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|