Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/12/1995 03:40 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 130 MARINE PILOTS
SENATOR LEMAN announced SB 130 to be up for consideration.
SENATOR LEMAN announced an at ease from 5:10 p.m. - 5:15 p.m.
JEFF BUSH, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Commerce and Economic
Development, said he was a member of the Marine Pilots Board and
supported SB 130 in its current form. He didn't have any
recommended changes. He said their position on maximum tariffs is
that they take no position on it. He thought there might be some
anti-trust concerns if there is no maximum tariff, but he had meant
with the association's attorneys and they felt confident there were
no anti-trust problems.
RICHARD MONKMAN, Alaska Coastwise Pilots Association, said he was
available for questions. He supported Mr. Bush's comments about
the maximum tariffs saying it did not affect his client in
Southeast.
DOUG MCPHERSON, President, Alaska Coastwise Pilots Association,
supported SB 130 in its current form. He didn't see where the
protection of a maximum tariff is required. The track record of
the state's involvement in maximum tariffs tends to be very
involved and somewhat costly. There is the question of whether it
is in the public's best interest to be involved.
LARRY COTTER, Alaska Steamship Association, supported a maximum
tariff. The law requires use of pilots and that sets up a
situation where they use pilots and it is absolutely critical that
they develop a relationship with the pilots that allows for the
commerce to flow freely and on time. He thought the proposed
amendment limiting the maximum tariff to only areas where there is
one association should be applied to all areas regardless of the
number of associations that are in that area. The role of the
state is to ensure that commerce flows. That is best accomplished
by having some state oversite regarding the maximum tariff that can
be charged by any association.
TAPE 95-44, SIDE A
Number 001
He noted that people who live in Juneau have discovered that two
airlines can operate a monopoly almost as effectively as one
company. Maximum tariff language has been in existence for the
last four years and there have been no problems with it.
STEPHAN MORENO, Alaska Marine Pilots, said they support the bill as
it is. In the western region things have stabilized without the
maximum tariff. He couldn't think of an example of where anyone
has charged an exorbitant amount for a particular pilot move.
HANS ANTONSON, Southeast Alaska Pilots Association, supported SB
130 as it came out of the subcommittee and said they don't have a
problem with the maximum tariff in a region that doesn't have
competition, but not in an area that has competition where market
factors are working.
Number 115
PETER LEE NIELSEN, representing himself, said he works for Alaska
Coastwise Pilots. In 1991 when the legislature provided for
competition in marine piloting he thought it was good for Alaska
and marine piloting. Having observed first hand the management
dynamics of both SEPA as a guild and ACP as an aggressive
competitor, he thought there were advantages to both methods.
However, competition has sharply divided and alienated southeast
pilots as a peer group, resulting in litigious actions costing
individuals and the Board of Marine Pilots considerable effort,
time, and expense, increased pilot license fees, raised concerns
and questions about pilot training, qualifications, and marine
safety issues. As a result, he thought the guild system provided
for stability, better trained pilots, and more qualified pilots,
and keeps safety of lives, vessels, and our shorelines and wildlife
foremost.
A true guild system of pilotage cannot exist in a competitive
market place, MR. NIELSEN said. Competition drives tariffs. A
maximum tariff pushes competing pilot associations into difficult,
and at times, last minute tariff negotiations with their principals
in order for them to stay in business and ensure employment for
their members. It's common knowledge that the low bidder in tariff
and contract negotiations usually gets the business. Therefore,
industry is in a favorable position. A state-fixed tariff
periodically visited by an appointed rate review commission would
bring structure and stability to a chaotic situation.
SENATOR LEMAN asked him to explain the guild system. MR. NIELSEN
explained it's the historical system of pilotage where people join
together to benefit themselves and it's become accepted that it
also benefits an area. When it first started there was pure
competition. His great-great-grandfather was one of those in
Norway who lost his life doing that. Later, because competition
disrupted commerce, pilots banded together for their own safety,
for their countries' commerce in a peer-guild system. Members of
the guild join together for the betterment of pilotage, the skills
and safety concerns of the state, and environmental concerns.
SENATOR LEMAN asked if he knew of an area where there was a true
guild system. MR. NIELSEN said there are true guild systems in the
United States, one is in Florida.
Number 237
ERIC ELIASSEN, President, Southwest Alaska Pilots Association, said
this bill incorporates the recommendations of the Alaska State
Pilots Alliance draft. In Southcentral they would accept the
maximum tariff amendment as opposed to fixed tariffs. He said they
could go either way and they were willing to go with arbitration in
those regions that did have competition.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|