Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/08/1995 01:30 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SJUD-2/8/95
SB 14 INCREASED PENALTIES FOR JOYRIDING
SENATOR TAYLOR announced SB 14 was the next item on the agenda. At
his request, the Department of Law prepared an amendment to include
juveniles. The amendment (Amendment #1) makes joyriding a moving
traffic violation therefore both adult and juvenile violators would
be treated the same. SENATOR ELLIS asked if this provision would
trigger the new law that requires the mandatory waiver of juveniles
into adult court. SENATOR TAYLOR answered no, currently juveniles
are tried in adult court for moving traffic violations, such as
speeding or driving in a negligent manner. The amendment would
specifically designate joyriding as a moving traffic violation.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved the adoption of Amendment #1. Due to
objection, the motion was under discussion.
Number 470
Margot Knuth, Assistant Attorney General with the Department of
Law, testified. She explained Amendment #1 would specify joyriding
as a criminal offense in Title 28. Title 47.10.010 (the statute
governing juvenile proceedings) requires that juveniles committing
offenses listed in Title 28 be waived to adult court. By creating
the offense in Title 28, juveniles over 16 years of age would be
tried as adults. The offense would also be reflected in the
offender's record. Driving privileges could then be suspended.
The amendment reflects several concerns of the Department of Law.
The first concern is the fiscal impact of raising first joyriding
offenses to a felony level, especially if juveniles are included,
because the number of joyriding incidents has doubled in Anchorage
alone. If first offenses are designated as felonies, the
Department of Law would have to prosecute those cases because
felonies can only be prosecuted by the State, therefore the cases
currently being handled by the Anchorage Municipality would be
transferred to the State. To further increase the workload, the
juvenile offenders, which comprise 50 percent of the cases, would
also be referred to the Department of Law. The number of new
felony cases prosecuted by the Department would be 400 to 800 per
year. Secondly, juveniles would not be affected by changing the
first offense to a felony, because delinquency rules require those
offenders be treated as juveniles and the offense would not be
reflected in their records.
Ms. Knuth explained the amendment leaves criminal mischief offenses
where they are now, and adds to Title 28 the joyriding offense
which would be recorded as a first offense unless the offender
causes $500 or more in damages to the vehicle, which is currently
a felony. The intent is to target the hundreds of cases in
Anchorage in which cars are taken but either not damaged, or in
which damages cost less than $500. By placing the offense in Title
28, it will remain a misdemeanor and can be prosecuted by
municipalities and the State, and an offender's license would
automatically be suspended upon conviction. This method would be
enforceable on a consistent and thorough basis, and could be
considered an incremental approach to the problem.
Ms. Knuth noted she has been advised by Anchorage police officers
that license suspension is the single most effective means of
getting a juvenile's attention. By including this measure in Title
28, points from the offense would carry over to further license
actions if the person re-offends.
Number 526
SENATOR ADAMS noted the amendment allows the offense to be
considered a Class C felony, which is punishable by a fine of up to
$50,000 or five years of prison. He asked what other types of
crimes are categorized as Class C felonies. MS. KNUTH stated this
amendment does not change a second offense to a Class C felony;
that is already in statute. Other Class C felonies include
possession of cocaine, theft of property valued at more than $500,
and reckless tampering with the pipeline. She noted Senator
Leman's original bill would have made a first occasion joyriding
offense a Class C felony and would elevate a second offense to a
Class B felony. The amendment maintains first offenses as
misdemeanors, but allows a Class C felony designation for the
second offense.
SENATOR ADAMS asked Ms. Knuth if she believed joyriding should be
classified with other Class C felonies. MS. KNUTH replied she was
unaware of the Administration's position on the existing law that
makes joyriding a felony when it is a second offense.
SENATOR ADAMS noted the fiscal note from the Alaska State Troopers
indicates there are 700 thefts per year, yet reflects no costs
associated with the passage of SB 14. He questioned the
underestimation of costs.
SGT. JOE D'AMICO, Alaska State Troopers (AST), responded to Senator
Adams' concern. He noted the Alaska State Troopers response to
vehicle thefts would not be affected by raising the offense to a
felony since the type and amount of investigations conducted by the
AST would not change. He estimated the AST solves about two-
sevenths of the reported cases. Approximately half of the reported
cases are not treated as criminal mischief cases, usually because
of the juvenile factor. If the offense is classified as a felony,
approximately 100 cases would be prosecuted, and the only
difference would be a Grand Jury hearing which would have a
negligible fiscal impact on the Alaska State Troopers. He stated
of the 700 cases, 2 went to trial.
SENATOR ADAMS asked if the State would be required to prosecute the
cases in court if the offense is changed to a felony. SGT. D'AMICO
replied affirmatively. SENATOR ADAMS expressed doubt that the AST
would have sufficient funds to apprehend these offenders. He
questioned the need for a supplemental appropriation and the
additional 8 positions requested by the Alaska State Troopers.
SGT. D'AMICO stated if the crime is changed from a misdemeanor to
a felony, the investigative responsibility would not shift from the
municipality to the Alaska State Troopers, therefore there would be
no fiscal impact. The fiscal impact would occur in the agency
prosecuting the cases.
TAPE 95-5, SIDE B
SENATOR TAYLOR asked if there was further objection to the
amendment. SENATOR ADAMS maintained his objection. A roll call
vote was taken with the following result: Senators Green, Miller,
and Taylor voted "Yea" and Senators Ellis and Adams voted "Nay."
SENATOR MILLER moved SB 14 as amended out of committee with
individual recommendations. SENATOR ELLIS asked if the committee
would be receiving a revised fiscal note from the Court System.
SENATOR TAYLOR replied that would have to be presented to the
Finance Committee. SENATOR ELLIS expressed concern that the
amendment makes a significant fiscal impact to the bill.
Number 556
Ms. Knuth clarified the amended version is the less expensive
version. Elevating first offenses to felonies and including
juveniles would have increased the costs significantly. The
approach taken by the committee in adopting the amendment is more
economical than any other approach considered by the committee.
The original fiscal notes are much closer to being accurate to the
amended version.
SENATOR TAYLOR stated the motion before the committee was to move
SB 14 as amended from committee with individual recommendations.
SENATOR ADAMS objected. A roll call vote was taken with the
following results: Senators Miller, Taylor and Green voted "Yea"
and Senators Ellis and Adams voted "Nay." The motion passed.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|