Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/15/1995 09:07 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 6
"An Act relating to registration of a motor vehicle and
suspension of a driver's license for failure to appear
in court or failure to pay a fine."
Senator Halford announced Joe Ambrose from Senator Taylor's
office and asked him to join the committee. Mr. Ambrose
stated that Senator Taylor is the sponsor of SB 6. It is
designed to provide the court system and municipalities
throughout Alaska with additional leverage in the collection
of fines relating to moving vehicle citations and parking
offenses. He also stated that it applies to an individual
who fails to appear in court as ordered. This legislation
passed the Senate last year on a 17 - 3 vote as SB 166. SB
6 would be a valuable tool for use by the courts in
addressing the problems created by those who choose to
ignore the law, especially those who fail to make court
ordered appearances or to pay fines imposed by the court.
The bill is based on statutes from other states. The
experience in the State of Washington indicates that over
50% of those who receive notice of possible sanctions, clear
up outstanding matters within a week. SB 6 ties together
the failure to settle moving violations to the drivers
license, and parking violations to vehicle registration.
This mirrors the California law. A new fiscal note from the
Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles
indicates a change for additional leased office space for
$10.0. The bill continues to be a generator of revenue
based on the renewal fees for a suspended license.
Co-chair Halford noted that the change from $104.8 to $114.6
is reasonable.
Senator Phillips noted a situation that involved a Chugiak
resident who received a ticket and was to appear before the
court. He claims that he did not receive notice to appear
before court due to an incorrect address.
Mr. Ambrose responded that this is an option for the court,
it is not mandatory. He mentioned that there are over
25,000 outstanding moving violations fines in a given year.
The court system was working on the assumption that
approximately 10% of those would fall into this system.
Mr. Ambrose stated that Senator Taylor's office has received
a response from the parking ferries. There have been
several POM's generated. The opposition is not to the
overall thrust of the bill, but rather to Section 2 which
applies to unpaid parking fines and would lead to non-
renewal of the vehicle registration. The area of concern is
in Anchorage, and in particular, the Anchorage Parking
Authority. Section 2 was included last year at the
suggestion of several municipal attorneys. The sponsor does
not take great ownership in this section, and if it were
deleted he would not be upset.
Senator Rieger supports the amendment and asked what it
would do to the fiscal note. He stated that the Anchorage
Parking Authority cites for improper placement or tagging of
license plates. Senator Donley stated that he has a draft
amendment, and recommended holding the bill. He stated that
there is a problem when ticketed by the Anchorage Parking
Authority, in that there are no appellate rights. A
prohibitive fee is required to challenge the ticket. When
ticketed by a peace officer or a state trooper, one has the
right to go to court and defend themselves. He stated that
when people are ticketed, based on state rules, they should
be provided with the same due process that the state
provides.
Senator Zharoff asked if Alaska would have reciprocity with
other states regarding the parking and moving violations.
Mr. Ambrose responded that he didn't know about parking
violations, but that there is an existing arrangement
whereby, if the State runs a records check and there is an
outstanding warrant, out-of-state, it can be executed.
Senator Zharoff then quoted Section 3, "When the person
appears in court or pays the required fine, the court shall
terminate the suspension imposed under this subsection and
provide the department and the person with written notice of
the termination." He noted that this process is very slow.
He stated that what should take minutes, often takes weeks
or months. He asked if this particular problem could be
remedied? Mr. Ambrose stated that he could not fix that
problem in this bill.
Mr. Ambrose reiterated that the intent of the legislation is
to give the court additional leverage. If there is a
failure to appear in court, the court at this time can issue
a warrant. The fact remains that there are so many of these
cases that it does not happen.
Senator Donley issued his proposed amendment. Co-chair
Halford asked if there was conflict in his amendment insofar
as removing Section 2 from SB 6. Senator Donley responded
there was no conflict. Senator Phillips moved to delete
Section 2 from SB 6. No objection having been raised,
Section 2 has been deleted from the bill and will be
reflected in a CS.
Discussion was had on Senator Donley's proposed amendment.
Co-chair Halford asked that Senators Zharoff and Donley work
with Senator Taylor in redrafting the bill. The committee
agreed to hold the bill to the next meeting, Friday, March
17th.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|