Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/07/1995 01:06 PM House ARR
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
ARR - 02/07/95
CHAIRMAN RANDY PHILLIPS called the meeting of the Administrative
Regulation Review Committee to order at 1:06 p.m. The purpose of
the meeting was to discuss making a policy decision on introducing
a Senate resolution identical to HJR 1, or introducing a bill that
will abolish the Administrative Regulation Review Committee.
Chairman Randy Phillips directed attention to a letter from the
Office of the Attorney General expressing opposition to HJR 1
(REPEAL OF REGULATIONS BY LEGISLATURE), and then asked for
comments on the draft legislation before the committee.
Number 025
REPRESENTATIVE G. DAVIS commented that he would oppose abolishing
the committee at this time because there is a lot of work being
done nationwide on the role of legislatures in dealing with rules
and regulations.
CHAIRMAN RANDY PHILLIPS asked if Speaker Gail Phillips is committed
to passing the resolution this year. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG
replied that the subject has not been discussed or pursued yet, but
he knows that Speaker Phillips is not interested in abolishing the
committee at this time.
Number 072
REPRESENTATIVE DAVIES said putting the question before the voters
at this time is not a good idea because: (1) given its past track
record, it's not very likely it will pass; and (2) he believes it
raises a really basic issue of the separation of powers. He
observed that the Legislature does have the power by enacting a
bill and overriding a veto to change regulations. Also, there is
another avenue through judicial appeal if a regulation violates the
law.
Representative Davies said it is an important function of the
Legislature to have a venue in which citizens can request a review
of a particular regulation, and he suggested the committee could
play an important role in reviewing these regulations and could
have the option of proposing new legislation or working with the
Administration to get egregious things changed.
SENATOR ELLIS agreed with the comments made by Representative
Davies.
Number 125
SENATOR RIEGER stated he favors the constitutional amendment, but
he is unsure about abolishing the committee. He suggested waiting
to see how the resolution progresses before making that decision.
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG voiced his support for the resolution. He
said in a conversation he had with Paul Richards, who is president
of the State Chamber of Commerce, Mr. Richards indicated that the
State Chamber would be willing to generate an inquiry through all
the chambers in the state specifically requesting problematic
regulations businesses have experienced. These responses could be
directed back to the Administrative Regulation Review Committee.
CHAIRMAN RANDY PHILLIPS said his office would make contact with Mr.
Richards, but he pointed out that the NFIB (National Federation of
Independent Businesses) and the RDC (Resource Development Council)
were contacted on this same issue, but, as yet, they have failed to
respond. He said the proposed legislation would be put on hold
until the House's commitment on passing a resolution can be
determined.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|