Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/20/1996 02:00 PM Senate CRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 361 CAP PROJ MATCHING GRANT FOR INDIAN RESERV
SENATOR TORGERSON brought HB 361 before the committee as the next
order of business.
Number 165
REPRESENTATIVE JERRY MACKIE, prime sponsor of HB 361, explained he
introduced the legislation at the request of the Metlakatla Indian
Community when their FY 96 Municipal Assistance Matching Grant
Program appropriation was eliminated from last year's budget.
Metlakatla qualified for this program under the Department of
Administration regulations definition for "municipality."
HB 361 amends AS 37.06 (Capital Project Matching Grants Programs)
by adding a new section that includes a municipality organized
under federal law as an Indian reserve. The bill has been drafted
to specifically include the Metlakatla Indian Community within the
Municipal Assistance Matching Grant Program. It also provides that
Metlakatla may not receive a grant under the Unincorporated
Community Capital Project Matching Grant Program.
Representative Macki said it was clearly the intent of the original
Act to include Metlakatla, but because it has a little different
classification meaning a municipality organized under federal law
as an Indian Reserve, the technical language didn't cover that.
Representative Macki noted there has been some question as to
whether or not this would open up the door to issues relating to
Indian lands and tribal status in qualifying for these grants, but
he has received an opinion from the attorney general that says it
will not because it is very specific in the legislation that it has
to be a municipality organized under federal law that existed
before enactment of 43 U.S.C. 1618(a).
Number 215
SENATOR TORGERSON pointed out the most recent fiscal note on the
bill shows that $16,609 would need to come out of other
communities' grants to make this transition. REPRESENTATIVE MACKI
responded he does not think it is an added fiscal note; it shows
how the $19,000 that should have gone to Metlakatla last year was
actually distributed. In his opinion it is a positive fiscal note
for the other communities until this legislation is passed and the
statute is clarified. He does not believe that it should be
interpreted as taking away from other communities because they've
actually been getting extra money because Metlakatla was not
included.
Number 250
SENATOR ZHAROFF moved HB 361 be passed out of committee with
individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|