Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/21/1995 01:40 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 202
An Act relating to the participation and accountability
of parents and guardians and the enforcement of
restitution orders entered in juvenile delinquency
proceedings; relating to claims on permanent fund
dividends for certain court-ordered treatment in
juvenile delinquency proceedings; changing Alaska
Supreme Court Delinquency Rules 3(b) and 8(b); and
providing for an effective date.
LAURIE OTTO, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, CRIMINAL DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF LAW testified in support of HB 202. She
emphasized that parent groups and individuals working with
juveniles have expressed concern with the increasing number
of juveniles in trouble and a lack of parent involvement.
She pointed out that section 2 requires parents to attend
juvenile delinquency hearings unless excused by the Court
for good cause. She emphasized the need for parent
participation. She noted that the legislation would allow
the Court to require parent counseling. The parents are
also responsible for communicating with the Court if the
minor is not applying with court orders. She noted that
section 1 would allow the parent's permanent fund dividend
to be taken to pay for court ordered treatment. She added
that the legislation would allow courts to order parents to
pay restitution in criminal cases. She stressed that
currently the judgement would cease when the juvenile left
the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Under the
legislation the judgement would remain against the parent.
In response to a question by Representative Brown, Ms. Otto
clarified that the parent's presence would not be required
until a petition of delinquency is filled. She noted that
parents are currently involved in 99 percent of the cases at
4
the juvenile in-take stage.
Representative Martin MOVED to report CSHB 202 (HES) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
Representative Therriault referred to the definition of
"runaway or mission minor". Ms. Otto explained that the
language clarifies statute.
CSHB 202 (HES) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with a fiscal impact note by the
Alaska Court System and with seven zero fiscal notes; two by
the Department of Administration, dated 2/27/95; three by
the Department of Health & Social Services, dated 2/27/95;
one by the Department of Revenue, dated 2/27/95; and one by
the Department of Law, dated 2/27/95.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|