Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/27/1995 10:40 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 79(FIN)
An Act allowing the Department of Natural Resources to
quitclaim land or interests in land, including
submerged or shore land, to a municipality to correct
errors or omissions of the municipality when
inequitable detriment would result to a person due to
that person's reliance upon the errors or omissions of
the municipality.
Co-chairman Halford directed that CSHB 79 (Fin) be brought
on for discussion. Representative Jerry Mackie, sponsor,
came before committee. He explained that the bill relates
to a 50-year-old problem that occurred at Skagway
immediately after World War II. The river was eroding the
front portion of the city, and the Army Corps of Engineers
constructed a dike. The city subsequently backfilled behind
the dike and subdivided and sold the property. Owners of
the lots now have clouded title which raises problems when
one attempts to sell or transfer a lot. The community high
school is also located on the property. The Dept. of
Natural Resources has been unable to rectify the problem. A
statutory fix is thus necessary. The bill contains an 18-
month sunset provision which allows a window within which
the Dept. of Natural Resources could fix the problem for
Skagway. That window would then cease to exist.
Representative Mackie referenced a map of the area showing
the 10 to 12 lots impacted by the bill. He reiterated that
the mistake
was made by the community prior to statehood, zoning laws,
etc. Skagway has had perpetual problems with the issue.
Both the Dept. of Natural Resources and the city of Skagway
requested the proposed bill.
Senator Randy Phillips asked that the Dept. of Natural
Resources contact communities to ensure that no others are
experiencing a problem similar to that at Skagway.
Representative Mackie advised that Skagway has not yet
reached its entitlement. Land impacted by the proposed bill
would apply toward that cap.
Senator Zharoff acknowledged that similar legislation had
been before the legislature for a number of years. The
issue was discussed in Senate Resources, and an amendment to
resolve the problem was included in another bill.
Co-chairman Halford asked if the bill would cover other
municipalities. Representative Mackie responded negatively.
Co-chairman Frank noted that his concern at the time Senate
Resources amended Senator Leman's bill was "the broad
application of the opportunity to control submerged or
tidelands." He then voiced his understanding that the
proposed bill reflects a "limited application for
tidelands." Representative Mackie concurred.
In response to an additional question from Co-chairman
Halford, Representative Mackie advised that Skagway is a
first class city which has not received its full entitlement
from the state. Co-chairman Halford said he would feel more
comfortable had Senate Resources reviewed the bill. He
again sought assurance that the legislation would have no
other application than to Skagway.
NICO BUS, Legislative Liaison, Dept. of Natural Resources,
came before committee. He said that the department would
contact the various municipalities. He added that, to the
best of his knowledge, no other municipality qualifies under
the terms of the bill. Co-chairman Frank asked what feature
of the bill limits it to Skagway. Representative Mackie
voiced his understanding that as the bill is drafted, with
the criteria laid out, no other municipalities have brought
similar problems to the department's attention. The
department has attempted to resolve the problem for ten
years. It was determined that the only way to do so was per
the wording in the present bill. Co-chairman Halford voiced
concern that language within the bill would lead people to
believe that if they relied on an error by any municipality,
the Dept. of Natural Resources is authorized to "give them
the state land to make up the problem." The bill only
applies to the entitlement, if an entitlement remains. If
the municipality has no remaining entitlement, the bill
still works. Co-chairman Frank suggested limiting the bill
to first class cities.
Senator Phillips asked how the Dept. of Natural Resources
determined no other communities would be involved. Mr. Bus
explained that the Dept. of Community and Regional Affairs,
Alaska Municipal League, and Dept. of Natural Resources have
all been involved in both the issue and numerous legislative
hearings over a number of years. There has been sufficient
public process but no feedback from "any other
municipalities."
Co-chairman Frank MOVED to delete the word "municipality"
and insert "first class city" in lieu thereof throughout
subsection (11) on pages 3 and 4. Other members raised the
issue of a possible title change to the House legislation.
Co-chairman Frank voiced his belief that the wording change
would be consistent with title language referring to a
municipality. Co-chairman Halford called for objections to
the amendment. None were forthcoming, and the amendment was
ADOPTED for incorporation within a Senate Finance Committee
Substitute.
Senator Randy Phillips MOVED that SCS CSHB 79 (Fin) pass
from committee with individual recommendations and
accompanying zero fiscal notes. Several scenarios for
changing the wording within subsection (11) without
impacting the title were suggested by Co-chairman Frank and
Senator Rieger. Co-chairman Halford subsequently suggested
that a legal opinion be obtained. Senator Phillips withdrew
his motion for passage, and the bill was HELD in committee
pending receipt of the above-noted opinion.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 11:05 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|