Legislature(1995 - 1996)
05/08/1995 02:05 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 20(FIN) am
An Act relating to conveyance of certain tide and
submerged land to municipalities; and providing for an
effect date.
Co-chairman Halford directed that CSHB 20(Fin)am be brought
on for discussion. REPRESENTATIVE CARL MOSES came before
committee accompanied by his aide, NANCY HEMENWAY. Mrs.
Hemenway explained that the bill was introduced to address
concerns raised by the Aleutians East Borough regarding
Dept. of Natural Resources leasing which can be cumbersome,
costly to obtain, and widely varied in terms. It is
difficult to obtain general obligation bonding without fee
simple title or a 55-year lease on the land. Certain first-
class and home-rule cities incorporated prior to April of
1964 were conveyed their tide and submerged lands. The
proposed bill would extend a right of conveyance for a
specific water-front project to municipalities incorporated
after 1964. The legislation is supported by the Alaska
Municipal League and port administrators.
Senator Rieger asked if the conveyance contemplated by the
bill would count against municipal entitlements or provide
land in addition to entitlements. Mrs. Hemenway said that
conveyance would be in addition to entitlements. The Dept.
of Natural Resources can convey lands, providing that
certain criteria is met. She then deferred further comment
to department staff.
RON SWANSON, Director, Division of Land, Dept. of Natural
Resources, came before committee, voicing support for the
legislation. He explained that it would allow the
department to convey improved tidelands to municipalities
for local control. It will also limit state liability and
management expenses.
Co-chairman Halford inquired regarding the maximum amount of
land a municipality might receive as a result of the
proposed bill. Mr. Swanson said it would not be very much.
It would be land upon which a dock, seafood processing
facility, small boat harbor, etc. is located. Co-chairman
Halford voiced his understanding that a municipality can
only make application if there is an existing or proposed
new lease on the property to a third party. Mr. Swanson
responded affirmatively. The Co-chairman observed that
while the state would lose the small amount of revenue
generated by the leases, it would also be absolved of
liability and management costs. Mr. Swanson again
concurred.
In response to a question from Senator Sharp, Mr. Swanson
reiterated that past legislation allowed home-rule and
first-class cities formed prior to 1964 to receive
conveyance of tidelands in front of their boundaries. The
proposed bill would provide equity for municipalities formed
since that time.
Senator Rieger directed attention to the top of page 4,
noted references to the "public trust doctrine" and
"conveyance for shore fisheries," and asked for an
explanation. Mr. Swanson advised that any conveyance of
land by the department is made subject to the public trust
doctrine. That ensures public access along Alaska's
coastline. The public trust doctrine is a living doctrine--
a common law provision that changes over time.
Municipalities must be aware of it at all times. Speaking
to conveyance for shore fisheries, Mr. Swanson explained
that provisions retain the shore fishery program within the
Dept. of Natural Resources. Municipalities cannot start
their own shore fish program. The department can continue
to issue shore fishery leases if compatible with municipal
uses.
Senator Rieger next raised a question regarding whether
areas below or above the high tide mark would be conveyed
under the proposed bill. Mr. Swanson responded, "It's the
area below the high tide line."
Senator Rieger voiced his understanding that the public
trust doctrine ensures that there is no difference in public
access, in terms of walking along the shore, whether the
state or municipality owns the property. Mr. Swanson
concurred.
Co-chairman Halford referenced fiscal note costs totaling
$40.3 and a revenue loss of ($100.0). He then queried
members regarding disposition of the bill. Senator Zharoff
MOVED that CSHB 20 (Fin)am pass from committee with
individual recommendations. No objection having been
raised, CSHB 20 (Fin)am was REPORTED OUT of committee with a
$6.0 fiscal note from the Dept. of Natural Resources
(Information Resource Management), a $34.3 note from the
Dept. of Fish and Game, a zero note from the Dept. of
Natural Resources (Land Development) evidencing revenue loss
of ($100.0), and a zero note from the Dept. of Community and
Regional Affairs. Co-chairman Halford and Senator Zharoff
signed the committee report with a "do pass" recommendation.
Senators Phillips, Rieger, and Sharp signed "no
recommendation."
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|