2017-03-16                     House Journal                      Page 0579
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 52                                                                 
be adopted?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 57(FIN) am                                                                                                                 
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 52                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  17   NAYS:  21   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp,                                                                
Millett, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard,                                                                 
Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn,                                                                          
Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux,                                                                  
Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Claman, Neuman                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 52 was not adopted.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 52 was offered  by                                                                              
Representative Eastman:                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Under Page 37, line 10, following "6,763,700":                                                                                  
 Insert "It is the intent of the legislature that we quickly move to                                                            
have legislative housing arranged for by the Legislative Affairs                                                                
Agency to ensure that legislators are no longer required to procure                                                             
lodging in Juneau while simultaneously being required by law to                                                                 
maintain a residence in their home district, and thereby reducing the                                                           
need for excessive per diem for legislators."                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 52 be adopted.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck objected.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Representative Fansler rose to a point of order regarding the debate.                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative LeDoux rose to a point of order.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker cautioned members to confine remarks to the                                                                         
amendment.