Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2013-04-10 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2057
Full Journal pdf2013-04-10 House Journal Page 1026 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 57(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 57(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 57(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 57(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Drummond, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Gruenberg, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Guttenberg And so, CSHB 57(JUD) passed the House. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Pruitt later gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 57(JUD), and reconsideration was taken up then.