Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2012-02-24 House JournalFull Journal pdf
2012-02-24 House Journal Page 1695 HB 267 Representative Johnson moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of 2d CSHB 267(JUD) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2d CSHB 267(JUD) was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall 2d CSHB 267(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2d CSHB 267(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 33 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 7 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Dick, Doogan, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Petersen, Pruitt, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Cissna, Edgmon, Gardner, Gatto, Joule, Olson, Saddler And so, 2d CSHB 267(JUD) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2d CSHB 267(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.