Legislature(1995 - 1996)

1995-04-20 Senate Journal

Full Journal pdf

1995-04-20                     Senate Journal                      Page 1122
SB 53                                                                        
Senator Kelly requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR                     
SENATE BILL NO. 53(JUD) be taken up.                                           
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 53(JUD) was before the Senate on                        
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL                    
NO. 53(JUD) "An Act relating to regulation of risk retention or                
purchasing groups; to preemption of the regulation of insurance                
agents and insurance producers; to the general powers of the director          
of the division of insurance; to insurance examination hearings; to            
insurer certificates of authority; to annual and quarterly statements,         
taxes, and prohibited acts of insurers; to reinsurance credit allowed          
a domestic insurer; to risk based capital for insurers; to insurer assets      
and liabilities; to insurer investments; to insurance holding                  
companies; to regulation, licensing, examination, and trade practices          
of insurance producers, managing general agents, third-party                   
administrators, brokers, independent adjusters, and reinsurance                
intermediary managers; to surplus lines insurance; to criminal                 
insurance acts; to premium increases in automobile insurance; to               
insurance rating; to assigned risk pools; to filing and approval of            
certain insurance policy forms; to required insurance coverage for             
acupuncture, nurse midwives' services, mammography, and                        
phenylketonuria; to health insurance provided by small employers; to           
transfer of an insurer's status as a domestic insurer; to quarterly            
statements of benevolent associations, fraternal benefit societies, and        
health maintenance organizations; to reciprocal insurers; to the               
definition of `member insurer' for purposes of the Alaska Life and             
Disability Insurance Guaranty Association; to electronic insurance             
data transfer and insurance funds transfer; to the definitions of              
`managing general agent' and `person' applicable to insurance law;             
to automobile assigned risk plans; placing a person employed by the            
division of insurance as an actuary or assistant actuary into the              
exempt service; amending Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 45; and                
providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?"  The roll was               
taken with the following result:                                               

1995-04-20                     Senate Journal                      Page 1123
SB 53                                                                        
CSSB 53(JUD)                                                                   
Third Reading - On Reconsideration                                             
Effective Date                                                                 
Court Rule Change                                                              
YEAS:  17   NAYS:  3   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
Yeas:  Adams, Duncan, Frank, Green, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman,                     
Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor,                
Torgerson, Zharoff                                                             
Nays:  Donley, Ellis, Halford                                                  
and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 53(JUD) passed the Senate on                    
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective             
date clause.  Without objection, it was so ordered.                            
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule            
change.  Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was                 
referred to the Secretary for engrossment.