Legislature(1995 - 1996)

1995-01-30 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

1995-01-30                     House Journal                      Page 0177
SCR 6                                                                        
Representative Mackie brought up reconsideration of the vote on SCR            
6 (page 161).                                                                  
                                                                               
                                                                               
The following was again before the House in second reading:                    
                                                                               
SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 6                                            
Strongly urging the Governor to continue the lawsuit known as                 
State of Alaska v. Babbitt, C.A. No. 94-35480, and to pursue the               
State of Alaska's position that the United States Secretary of the             
Interior and Secretary of Agriculture do not have the authority to             
assume management of fish and wildlife on public land in the                   
State of Alaska.                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Brown:                           
                                                                               
Page 3, line 5, after "will":                                                  
                                                                               
	Insert "attempt to"                                                           
                                                                               
Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that                    
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                    
                                                                               
Representative Vezey objected.                                                 
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?"  The roll             
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SCR 6--RECONSIDERATION                                                         
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 1                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  15   NAYS:  23   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster,              
Grussendorf, Ivan, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson,                
Williams                                                                       
                                                                               

1995-01-30                     House Journal                      Page 0178
SCR 6                                                                        
Nays:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, James,                
Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell,             
Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Toohey, Vezey, Willis                     
                                                                               
Excused:  MacLean, Therriault                                                  
                                                                               
And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                       
                                                                               
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall SCR 6 pass the House?"  The           
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
SCR 6--RECONSIDERATION                                                         
Second Reading                                                                 
Final Passage                                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  23   NAYS:  15   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, James,                
Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell,             
Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Toohey, Vezey, Willis                     
                                                                               
Nays:  Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster,              
Grussendorf, Ivan, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson,                
Williams                                                                       
                                                                               
Excused:  MacLean, Therriault                                                  
                                                                               
And so, SCR 6 passed the House, was signed by the Speaker and                  
Chief Clerk and returned to the Senate.