Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-01 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20372
Full Journal pdf1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3521 HB 372 Representatives Mackie and Navarre declared a conflict of interest. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 as amended be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 372(L&C) am--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 2 as amended YEAS: 20 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, James, Kubina, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Toohey Nays: Austerman, Green, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Martin, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams, Willis Kott changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 2 as amended was not adopted. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 372(L&C) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 3. Objection was heard. The question being: Shall CSHB 372(L&C) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 3? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 372(L&C) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second for Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis