SB 103-AMHS OPERATION & PLANNING BOARD  1:33:25 PM CHAIR MYERS announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 103 "An Act repealing the Alaska Marine Transportation Advisory Board; establishing the Alaska Marine Highway System Operation and Planning Board; and providing for an effective date." 1:34:14 PM ANDY MILLS, Special Assistant to the Commissioner, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOTPF), Juneau, Alaska, stated that SB 103 would restructure the Alaska Marine Highway Advisory Board (MTAB) based on recommendations from AMHS's Reshaping Work Group. This group was formed by the governor's Administrative Order (AO) 313. The group held 29 meetings and produced an October 2020 report that made 29 recommendations to the governor, including one to restructure the board. He explained that the Alaska Marine Highway System Operation & Planning Board (OPB) would be better suited to address AMHS issues than MTAB because it would have additional resources and information. 1:35:24 PM SENATOR MICCICHE joined the meeting. 1:35:32 PM MR. MILLS referred to page 14 of AMHS's Reshaping Work Group report. He read, "The current MTAB is formed of capable individuals but not structured to effectively challenge and help the Alaska Marine Highway System with the large marine operation planning and execution issues that it confronts." The work group's recommendation was to produce a board that could focus on operations and planning; one that would be well-grounded with outside advice focused on business and financial practices. This board would change member credential and reporting requirements. 1:36:33 PM MR. MILLS paraphrased the sectional analysis for SB 103: Section 1 AS 19.65.011 is amended to change the name of the Alaska Marine Transportation Advisory Board (MTAB) to the Alaska Marine Highway System Operation and Planning Board. A short-term plan (for the development and improvement of the Alaska marine highway system) is also added to the department's current statutory responsibility for development of a long-term plan. 1:37:42 PM Section 2 AS 19.65 is amended by adding a new subsection to establish the new Alaska Marine Highway System Operation and Planning Board in subsection 210; outline Board membership and terms in subsection 220; speak to officers and a quorum in subsection 230; stipulated meeting rules in subsection 240; address per diem and expenses in subsection 250; address record inspection/copying in subsection 260; establish the Department of Law as the Boards' legal assistance in subsection 270; document the Boards' powers, duties and functions in subsection 280; establish that the Department of Transportation & Public Facilities will provide staff support to the Board in subsection 290; and define the word 'Board' for purposes of AS 19.65 in subsection 295. 1:40:37 PM Section 3 repeals existing subsections 110 195 within chapter 65 which speak to the old MTAB. Section 4 adds a new section to the uncodified law of the State of Alaska to establish staggered terms for Board members and identify that former MTAB members are not prohibited from being reappointed to the new Alaska Marine Highway System Operation and Planning Board. Section 5 - adds a new section to the uncodified law of the State of Alaska to establish a deadline of September 1, 2021, for the Board's initial reports, as required under Section 2 of the proposal, to the governor. Section 6 - establishes an immediate effective date. 1:42:01 PM SENATOR BISHOP joined the meeting. 1:42:07 PM SENATOR MICCICHE stated that an ex officio member from each body previously served on MTAB. He asked whether including ex officio legislature members was considered or for a specific reason not to include them. MR. MILLS explained that the work group did not recommend members from the legislature serve on the board. He was unsure why but he thought part of the reason was to pivot to restructure and operate the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) more as a business. He suggested that the work group acknowledged that MTAB required a different skillset. 1:43:33 PM SENATOR SHOWER stated his intention to amend the bill to add legislative members to the Operating and Planning Board (OPB). He expressed frustration at missteps the AMHS previously made, including purchasing Alaska [fast ferries] that were later sold at a loss, partly because offramps were not appropriately designed. Currently, the legislature subsidizes a significant portion of the ferry system costs. He wondered if the new management structure would fail because the board lacked sufficient authority and the management structure did not include a chief executive officer. He expressed concern that the state continues to spend money on an unsustainable system. He recalled that the [Inter-Island Ferry serving Hollis and Ketchikan] consisted of 70 percent private funding and 30 percent state funding. He said that system uses a hub and spoke model with smaller vessels. He asked what actions OPB could take besides studying issues and compiling a report. He said it seems as though the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOTPF) would still run the system, so he wasn't sure OPB would work. MR. MILLS pointed out that Senator Shower mentioned the Alaska Class ferries; however, the fast ferries were the ones purchased and sold. He agreed this raises a fundamental question. OPB's effort was designed with board member expertise to inform its decisions rather than for AMHS's competent operational staff, busy with the day-to-day system operations, trying to squeeze in time to analyze meaningful changes to the system. He deferred to the deputy commissioner to speak to the board's authority. 1:47:20 PM ROB CARPENTER, Deputy Commissioner of Surface Transportation, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOTPF), Juneau, Alaska, on behalf of the administration, acknowledged that the work group struggled to identify ways to accomplish meaningful changes, barring going to a corporate model, such as the ones used by the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation or the Alaska Railroad Corporation. He envisioned that as Deputy Commissioner, he would serve as DOTPF's designee, acting as a liaison producing documents and providing direction to the board. He compared that to an advisory board providing input but not integrating or working with the agency on its mission. He highlighted the benefits of keeping AMHS within the agency, including allowing the department to address the multi-modal aspects of Alaska's transportation system. If AMHS were a separate corporation, it would not have the advantage of conducting planning across all modes and all regions. He offered his belief that having DOTPF staff serve on the board was instrumental in giving the board power and authority. Second, besides the board members with marine experience, other members will bring business experience to the board. These members could propose business decisions to create efficiencies that could make AMHS more effective and able to achieve long-term sustainability. He hoped that OPB would have sufficient power and authority to be effective. 1:50:03 PM SENATOR SHOWER highlighted that two ports are located in the Mat-Su district. Although he supports the ferry system, which is necessary because of Alaska's size, he was unsure what that system should ultimately resemble. He opined that AMHS was failing so another approach could achieve better results. 1:52:16 PM SENATOR KIEHL agreed with Senator Shower that the board must effectively challenge and help the department. He pointed out the similarities between MTAB and the new OPB established by SB 103. SB 103 would set up OPB as an 11-member board. Just like MTAB, OPB members will serve at the governor's pleasure, be staffed by DOTPF and advise DOTPF's deputy commissioner. However, OPB ultimately will not make any decisions. While he appreciated the new board members' expertise, nothing currently prevents the governor from appointing people with expertise. He asked how the department could better integrate this group and deeply involve OPB in long-term planning. He asked if OPB would have a substantive role in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) process so the board could also consider things such as system maintenance. He was unsure if OPB could participate in the budget process. He suggested that someone other than the governor should appoint some members to better insulate them from turnover. He asked what could be done to involve the board in the department's actual work. 1:54:30 PM MR. MILLS directed attention to the specific reporting requirements on page 4 of SB 103. These requirements would ensure that the board cannot omit crucial elements, such as cost-saving or income-producing business or procurement practices. He related his understanding that given the work group's recommendations, the administration considers OPB as a starting point. The administration was willing to discussing ways this board could truly impact AMHS's operations and planning to change AMHS's trajectory. He emphasized that this was not a rehashing work group designed to maintain the status quo; rather, it was evident that OPB could improve the system for the coastal communities that AMHS serves. 1:56:24 PM SENATOR MICCICHE said he agrees with the board composition and member expertise except for the members established in subparagraph (C), which read "two members, one of whom represents an Alaska native organization or tribe and one of whom represents a community served by the Alaska marine highway system;". Instead, this language should read "representatives of communities served by the AMHS, with one of those members representing an Alaska Native organization." He explained that the qualifications in subparagraphs (A) through (E) were system related, but the Alaska Native representative must also represent a coastal community served by AMHS. He acknowledged that the board was viewed as a starting point but expressed concern about the lack of a superior work product. In his experience working in the private sector, to effectively solve problems, the private sector would outline tasks and establish deadlines for the board to meet. He suggested that the bill establish specific work product deadlines for OPB's serious consideration on a much more aggressive schedule. Since AMHS's problems require action now, AMHS could garner statewide support by highlighting that OPB recognizes it needs more effective ways to conduct business. It would aggressively pursue those changes to deliver outcomes in a reasonable amount of time. 1:59:30 PM MR. CARPENTER highlighted that OPB needs to be in place as a sounding board, but it must also be an apolitical board driven by business-oriented members interested in making decisions using aggressive timelines. He said the new board must consider AMHS's current maintenance and recapitalization plans. 2:00:52 PM CHAIR MYERS recalled the work group essentially recommended minimizing politics for the board. He suggested establishing longer board terms, such as five or eight years to avoid wholesale board turnover. Since board members would serve three- year terms under SB 103, a governor could replace all board members during a single gubernatorial term. MR. MILLS responded that he could not speak for Boards and Commissions, but he recalled that their staff suggested the standard three-year terms. However, the administration was willing to consider longer terms. 2:02:07 PM CHAIR MYERS noted that SB 103 reduced updates to the long-term plan from five years to three years. However, placing updates too close together would change it from a planning process to a planning-to-plan process. Participants would not have time to think through and reflect on the updates. He suggested keeping the updates at five years. MR. MILLS responded that five years was a long time for board service. He related his understanding that the impetus was that a short-term plan would apply pressure to the group to work on specific issues actively. CHAIR MYERS was unsure that applying pressure to the board was as crucial as applying pressure to DOTPF. 2:04:10 PM SENATOR BISHOP asked if the board would actively develop AMHS's budget. MR. CARPENTER responded that he envisioned OPB would operate similarly to how the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority (AMHTA) or the University of Alaska, Board of Regents operates. OPB would compile a one-year budget and make recommendations to the governor to provide the legislature with another perspective, which may help depoliticize the process. He recalled that any changes or deviations made to AMHTA's budget would require an explanation by the legislature or the governor. He said the planning process should include budget interaction, which is not yet in the bill. SENATOR BISHOP asked if the board would actively develop AMHS's budget. He said it makes sense to base it on a five-year plan to coincide with the STIP funding. 2:07:14 PM SENATOR KIEHL agreed with Senator Bishop. He recalled that the Board of Education serves at the governor's pleasure. The board is briefed on the governor's proposed budget and then it votes to approve it. He suggested the bill would need a slight structural change to accomplish this. 2:08:16 PM SENATOR SHOWER asked which agency or person has the authority to execute the board's recommendations. MR. CARPENTER answered that under SB 103, OPB would submit its recommendations to DOTPF's commissioner, who would make the final decisions. He recommended that a DOTPF staff serve on the board as a liaison between the agency and the governor. He envisioned that person would work with the board to develop a consensus on issues and ways to accomplish them. This liaison could also provide information and guidance to the commissioner and the governor on the board's approach and rationale used to make board recommendations. SENATOR SHOWER agreed that it is critical to involve DOTPF in the process; however, the commissioner will ultimately make decisions, which has happened for a long time. It might be time to consider a different model, but the commissioner could still have someone serve on the board to coordinate efforts. [SB 103 was held in committee.]