SB 59-FEDERAL FUNDS TO MUNICIPALITIES FOR ROADS  CHAIRMAN COWDERY announced that SB 59 was heard by the committee at a previous hearing but was held while the committee awaited information on the bill. He asked Mary Jackson to testify on the measure. MARY JACKSON, legislative aide to Senator Torgerson, sponsor of SB 59, said at the last hearing a question was posed about the indirect cost allocation plan. She submitted information to that committee on that question from a similar project in Homer. In addition, she submitted a letter in support of SB 59 from the Alaska Municipal League. She offered to answer questions. There being no questions or further testimony, SENATOR TAYLOR moved SB 59 from committee with individual recommendations. SENATOR ELTON objected and noted that one concern about SB 59 expressed at the last hearing was that the amount of money available is like a balloon in that if it is squeezed in one area, it expands elsewhere. He asked what component of transportation dollars this money will come from. MR. TOM BRIGHAM, Statewide Planning Director, DOTPF, explained that the funds would come from a part of the program called the community transportation program. That program funds state-owned and local-owned community roads. SENATOR ELTON asked if that is the component DOTPF uses to work with communities to identify local projects that will be transferred to those communities after the state has funded the projects. MR. BRIGHAM answered that applies to a portion of the program: to projects that were locally owned prior to the improvement project that came along to the tune of about $50 million in 1999 and $45 million in 2000. That component also covers state-owned roads that are transferred to local communities for ownership and maintenance once the improvement project is done. SENATOR ELTON asked whether this bill could affect DOTPF's ability to reduce future expenses on those roads that would otherwise be turned over to local communities and reduce DOTPF's ability to accomplish road maintenance projects on the locally-owned roads. MR. BRIGHAM said it could have some of those effects. The discussion at the last hearing on SB 59 was to the point in terms of which communities actually have the capability of managing a federal project. Federal funding is not like a state grant for a road project, which is much simpler. You only get a promise of money if the project is done correctly. He thought the point at the last meeting was that it is the large communities with engineering capabilities that would tend to be eligible for most of this money. SENATOR ELTON removed his objection. There being no further objections, CHAIRMAN COWDERY announced that SB 59 had moved from committee.