SB 315 ALASKA RAILROAD PROCUREMENT  Number 172 CHAIRMAN RIEGER introduced SB 315 as the next order of business before the committee. He noted that there was a proposed CS. SENATOR GREEN moved that the CS, version C, be adopted in lieu of the original bill. Hearing no objection, the CS was adopted. HENRY SPRINGER, Executive Director for the Alaska Chapter of the Associated General Contractors, said that the association did not have any problem with the $25,000 limitation which is in the procurement code. He indicated that artificial separation of projects to keep the total below the $25,000 limitation should not occur. MARK HICKEY, Alaska Railroad Corporation, noted that the committee had been provided with more information regarding the type of projects the railroad gets involved with. A typical project, runs from $50,000 to $120,000. The railroad occasionally has large projects such as the "Bird to Gird" project which was a $1.5 million project. He understood that the bill would ensure a competitive process. Mr. Hickey suggested that the $25,000 be raised. Currently, under state law for DOT that limitation is $100,000. DOT can force account on construction under $100,000. He believed that a finding was required in order to show that the department could do the work for less than what it would otherwise be done. Number 225 CHAIRMAN RIEGER inquired of Mr. Springer's opinion of raising the limitation to somewhere between $25,000 and $100,000. HENRY SPRINGER believed that $25,000 was a fair limitation, however Mr. Springer acknowledged that the limitation should depend upon the normal scope of the work. In Mr. Springer's experience with railroad work with DOT, the work either falls in the lower end or the higher end. The $100,000 in the procurement code includes provisions for mobilization and demobilization in remote areas. The Alaska Railroad is not in remote areas. SENATOR GREEN asked if there were many contractors available that could do these types of projects. HENRY SPRINGER said that expertise is available in the market. In Mr. Springer's experience, the specifications governed what the contractor could do and that would be the basis for the bid. Nothing in SB 315 prevents the railroad from bidding on a project like any other contractor. CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if anyone else was present to testify. Hearing no one, he asked if there were any amendments. Hearing none, Chairman Rieger inquired as to the pleasure of the committee. SENATOR LINCOLN asked if there was anyone from DOT to testify. CHAIRMAN RIEGER said that no one from DOT had signed in. Chairman Rieger noted that Sam Kito III was present at the last meeting. SENATOR GREEN moved that CSSB 315(TRA) be moved from committee with individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so ordered.