STRA - 2/27/96 SB 274 NOISE AT AIRPORTS & SPORT SHOOTING RANGES  Number 455 CHAIRMAN RIEGER introduced SB 274 as the next order of business before the committee. SENATOR HALFORD, Prime Sponsor, noted that the committee packet should contain the sponsor statement, zero fiscal notes, and letters of support from various groups. SB 274 would prohibit suits against existing airports and sport shooting ranges for noise nuisance. Noise cannot be used to sue facilities that predated the objections. SENATOR LINCOLN assumed that the sponsor statement's reference to the population shift from urban to rural referred to the lower 48, not Alaska. SENATOR HALFORD replied yes. SENATOR HALFORD acknowledged that this is not a significant problem in Alaska yet. The objective is to establish a policy in order to eliminate the possibility of this becoming a problem. In response to Senator Lincoln, Senator Halford stated that he had not seen a specific example of this. There may be some areas that receive complaints after the fact. Number 424 CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if a municipality could not maintain an action or does it refer only to an individual. SENATOR HALFORD clarified that it would be exempt from a noise ordinance after the fact. Senator Halford intended that all considerations other than noise would remain available. SENATOR GREEN asked if heliports should be specifically included as suggested in the letter from the Alaska Air Carriers Association. SENATOR HALFORD supported the inclusion of helicopter operations. The drafter has suggested that a conceptual amendment could be used to add a definition of "aircraft" which would include rotorcraft. CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if the definition of sport shooting facility referred to that being the primary operation of the facility. SENATOR HALFORD assumed that it could also be an incidental operation. That is a legal question. CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if the facility's sport shooting was incidental, would changing the definition to specify that the sport shooting must be the primary use of the facility would constitute a substantial change in the use of the facility. SENATOR HALFORD suggested that it would constitute a change of use. Senator Halford reiterated that this only applies to noise considerations. Number 379 SAM KITO III, Legislative Liaison for the Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, said that the department has some general concerns which could be addressed by the Federal Aviation Administration. Mr. Kito asked the committee why state airports were not included. There was discussion about how to deal with the conceptual amendment. SENATOR GREEN moved the following amendment: page 2, line 29, after "aircraft," add "including fixed wing or rotorcraft". Hearing no objection, the amendment was adopted. SENATOR GREEN moved that CSSB 274 (TRA) be moved out of committee with individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so ordered.