SB 91-OMNIBUS CRIM LAW & PROCEDURE; CORRECTIONS  9:25:45 AM CHAIR STOLTZE called the committee back to order. He announced the consideration of SB 91. He noted that the intent was to present a committee substitute (CS), but additional time was required due to the bill's complexity. He conceded that being a constructive-cynic, he had non-pejorative concerns with the bill. SENATOR COGHILL disclosed that the proposed amendments for SB 91 would be presented to the committee after review by Legislative Legal. He disclosed that the proposed amendments encompassed questions that the Office of Victims' Rights brought forward, as well as a new concept that addressed drug testing for drug offenders in order to retain welfare. He summarized that the amendments dealt with cornerstone issues such as domestic violence, sexual assault awareness, and the victim's right to know what was going on. He conceded that some incongruencies had to be ironed out and protections narrowed down a bit. He said to be fair, the commission had a charge to look at the most cost savings as well as the best public safety and they did the best they could. He opined that additional amendments being presented that dealt with the handling of misdemeanants, probation, and parole would do so fairly well. He commented that additional amendments would be presented when the bill was in the Judiciary Committee. SENATOR MCGUIRE noted that three committee members were in the Judiciary Committee and would be up to speed when the bill was addressed. 9:31:26 AM SENATOR COGHILL expressed that Chair Stoltze had to put up with his petulance in trying to push the bill along. CHAIR STOLTZE said the bill had a tighter timeline and was being worked on concurrently in both bodies on the various fiscal plans. SENATOR COGHILL commented that the House was watching what the committee was doing and would probably take some of the work to heart. He pointed out that 11 codes and court rules were being addressed, a massive undertaking. He asserted that his impatience was related to getting to the "meat of the issue," but conceded that time was required to work things out. 9:33:17 AM CHAIR STOLTZE addressed a memo to Mr. Steiner, [Quinlan Steiner, Public Defender], that critiqued the Office of Victims' Rights previous testimony. He pointed out that the Public Defender Agency represented a different constituency than victims. SENATOR COGHILL noted that the state has constitutional provisions that deal with victims' rights as well as the correctional system. He said the intent was to try and balance between victims' rights and the correctional system. CHAIR STOLTZE commented that he was not in love with the subject matter, but conceded that the committee would endeavor to do its part to do the work as quickly as it can. [SB 91 was held in committee.] 9:35:56 AM There being no further business to come before the committee, Chair Stoltze adjourned the Senate State Affairs Committee at 9:35 a.m.