SB 64-OMNIBUS CRIME/CORRECTIONS BILL    9:25:50 AM CHAIR DYSON announced the consideration of SB 64. SENATOR JOHNNY ELLIS provided testimony on SB 64 on behalf of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He remarked that in terms of correction policies, Alaska is truly at a crossroads. Lawmakers have an opportunity to follow the best minds in the country on corrections reform to confront Alaska's rising prison costs, with an emphasis on public safety. He opined that the state can have both. He spoke of an epiphany he had during his work on correction policies when he came across a website called "Right On Crime." He highly recommended the site. He noted he agreed with the mission the group promoted. He stated that progressives and conservatives can work together and accomplish good work. He concluded it was a national movement. He noted that SB 64 does several things. It is designed to stem the tide of Alaska's climbing corrections costs, reduce recidivism, and increase public safety. It is called the "Smart Justice Movement." 9:29:10 AM SENATOR ELLIS spoke of the expense of the Goose Creek Correctional Facility project and the need to prepare for the next mega-prison almost immediately in order to keep up with the trajectory of increase in incarceration. He said there has to be a better way to protect the public and protect the treasury. CHAIR DYSON recalled information that Alaska incarcerates people at the highest rate in the nation, and the growth in the prison population is among the top four or five states. SENATOR ELLIS agreed. CHAIR DYSON said he respects Senator Ellis's experience. He asked about policy concerns of the bill. SENATOR ELLIS said he would need a minute to think this through. CHAIR DYSON stated that it is the intention of the committee to move the bill to Judiciary Committee to work on during the interim. 9:31:09 AM SENATOR GIESSEL moved to adopt the work draft CS for SB 64, labeled 28-LS0116\C, as the working document. There being no objection, version C was before the committee.   93124 CHAIR DYSON called a short at ease.   93157 CHAIR DYSON reconvened the meeting and recognized Mr. Hutchison. CHAD HUTCHISON, Staff, Senator John Coghill, explained the sections of SB 64 on behalf of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sponsor of the bill. SENATOR COGHILL suggested addressing the two conditional driver's license issues. 9:32:47 AM CHAIR DYSON requested information about how the bill addresses the mission stated by Senator Ellis. MR. HUTCHISON explained two ways that SB 64 addresses the mission to confront Alaska's rising prison costs, with an emphasis on public safety. The first way is by establishing the Alaska Sentencing Commission, which is found in Section 2. The commission will make recommendations and do the analysis with regards to improving sentencing practices. The second way deals with therapeutic courts, treatment programs, and limited drivers' licenses for misdemeanants and felons. MR. HUTCHISON provided a sectional overview. He said that Section 1 discusses credit for the time the defendant is in treatment. Section 3 deals with the termination of revocation of DUI's or refusals. It states that if a person successfully completes a court-ordered treatment program and has good behavior and has driven under a limited license for a period of time, the revocation terminates. It provides incentives for people to go through the therapeutic program. He related that Section 4 outlines when a court may grant limited license privileges. They must be associated with a DUI or a refusal and a person has to participate in a court-ordered treatment program. Section 5 outlines the procedure for someone who pleads no contest or guilty. The intent is to encourage people to receive treatment. He said Sections 6 and 7 were taken from SB 81 and deals with how the court restores the license if conditions are met. Sections 8 and 9 establish a program for certain offenders with random drug testing and probation conditions. 9:38:02 AM TIFFANY THOMAS, Driver Licensing Manager, Division of Motor Vehicles, Department of Administration, presented information related to SB 64. She explained the DMV process for termination of revocation. She said the court does not have access to DMV driving records, so once the revocations are modified by a DMV hearing officer, the court signs off that they agree to the modification of revocation and the applicant can apply to get their license back. She said the new CS appears to alleviate concerns about the felony termination process. She discussed Section 4 regarding the issuance of a limited license. In most cases the actions on a driving record run consecutive to one another so they compound with each new offense. This is especially true for someone convicted of a felony DUI. By the time a person is convicted of a felony DUI, they may already be revoked for ten years or more before they can get to the revocation for Wellness Court. The bill would allow a person in Wellness Court to drive with a limited license, even though they may be revoked or suspended for another offense. She noted that the court does not have access to the DMV driving record, so the problem is that the person's driving record may not be updated to reflect that the person may be on a limited license. If they are pulled over by law enforcement, all they will have is a piece of paper to show the limited license, however, their driving record may show that they are suspended or revoked. She highlighted another problem regarding DMV's limited license issuance for DUI's. She said it is also not clear if DMV would need to require an ignition interlock device with a limited license. 9:42:09 AM CHAIR DYSON asked what the impact might be on DMV's budget. MS. THOMAS replied that there was a zero fiscal note. SENATOR COGHILL said there has always been a problem with communication between the courts, DMV, and public safety. He suggested the bill might be able to create a better communication pathway, especially in light of accountability measures. CHAIR DYSON suggested the task force look at the barriers to communication. QUINLAN STEINER, Public Defender, Department of Administration, presented information on SB 64. He pointed out that the bill opens up treatment opportunities and provides incentives for treatment participation. He spoke of the benefits of treatment toward promoting public safety. CHAIR DYSON noted that the Senate Judiciary Committee would work more on that issue. He said he worries about technical parole violators and their difficulty getting to work without a driver's license. 9:45:38 AM CARMEN GUTIERREZ, Alaska Prisoner Reentry Task Force, testified in support of SB 64. She agreed with Senator Ellis' statement that, with this bill, Alaska has a real opportunity to look at proven best practices that may more effectively address criminality in Alaska, reduce recidivism, and build healthier, safer Alaska communities. She stressed that the time is right to address this new course and direction with the creation of an Alaska Sentencing Commission. MS. GUTIERREZ pointed out that crime in Alaska has actually decreased. According to the Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Report for 2011, all violent crime index offense total and property crime index offense total decreased. She said in spite of those decreases, the prison population continues to grow by 3 percent per year. Since 2005, the "hard bed" prison population cost the state $135 per day per bed. The number of those inmates grew from 4,200 inmates to 4,961 in 2012. At the current rate the Department of Correction (DOC) prison population will reach over 6,000 hard bed inmates by 2020. She stressed the need to build the next prison if that growth rate continues. She spoke of the goal to do what Texas did in 2007, which was to change to cost-effective ways to reduce criminality and recidivism. She related statistics from the Texas program: it avoided $2 billion in projected DOC expenses; the recidivism rate dropped, and the crime rate dropped. She described how Texas provided effective treatment programs as the most cost effective way to reduce costs and recidivism. MS. GUTIERREZ concluded that the Alaska Legislature increased DOC's budget for treatment programs within prisons and within communities. She said she is hopeful that there will be positive results shown in 2013 and 2014 as a result of the increased funding. 9:51:56 AM MS. GUTIERREZ noted that the majority of Alaska's criminal statutes were re-written in 1982 and much has been learned since then. She stated that this bill will help reduce criminality in Alaska. Current laws are not working, and she is hopeful that SB 64 will make Alaska safer and healthier. CHAIR DYSON voiced appreciation for Ms. Gutierrez's work. MS. GUTIERREZ said it was her honor. 9:53:40 AM JANET MCCABE, Partners for Progress, testified in support of SB 64. She described Partners for Progress' efforts initiating Therapeutic Courts for DUI offenders in Alaska and participating in Smart Justice in order to reduce waste of public and human resources through excessive incarceration. She said the bill is an excellent step toward achieving that goal. She mentioned that Senator Dyson said by doing the smart thing, not just the tough thing, Alaska can create good economies and public safety improvements. MS. MCCABE highlighted Sections 3 - 7 that allow a successful participant in a court-ordered treatment plan to drive on a limited license as a pathway to getting a full license. In the classic Smart Justice format, these sections recognize the reality of DUI offenders' addictions, as well as the reality of every-day life in an Alaskan community without the ability to drive. She described the three main categories of beneficial effects found in the five sections. The opportunity to drive legally provides an incentive for treatment. More people opting into Therapeutic Courts results in less costly, community-based treatment programs. Specialized addiction treatment is designed to break the pattern of recycling through the prison system. Another benefit is that the possibility of employment is enhanced. Additionally, the requirement for on-going drug and alcohol testing is Smart Justice and is based on scientific evidence that recovery is stabilized after 4 or 5 years of sustained abstinence. She concluded that SB 64 is an important step forward toward criminal justice system reform that solves problems and reduces excessive incarceration. 9:59:16 AM CHAIR DYSON thanked Ms. McCabe. SENATOR GIESSEL described an incident of a drunk driver with chronic alcohol issues. SENATOR COGHILL said it is not possible to stop all drunk drivers. He noted that the bill gives the courts the capacity to mandate the ignition interlock device, which is victim protection. He thought the question is whether the legislature has put enough money into the specialty courts. He emphasized that the bill provides ways to protect the public. JEFF MITTMAN, Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Alaska, testified in support of SB 64. 10:02:26 AM CHAIR DYSON commented that there were areas that remain unclear in the mission statement. He suggested clarifying the process for expunging the felony conditions. He noted that other states have done so. He spoke of his work on restorative justice and a concern that assets of the perpetrator should go to the victim. He understood that many on probation serve their time serially. He voiced concern about those who violate probation for technical reasons, such as those related to transportation needs. He stressed the impact of over-sentencing on a family and the social cost. 10:05:43 AM NANCY MEADE, General Counsel, Office of the Administrative Director, Alaska Court System, testified that the Court System supports the Sentencing Commission that is described in Section 2 of SB 64, and that the Chief Justice is enthusiastic about making the appointments on the Commission. She noted that she will continue to work on the other sections of the bill with the sponsor. She voiced support for Therapeutic Courts. She related that many provisions came out of the Criminal Justice Working Group. She said they recognized that people without licenses have a hard time getting to work and to probation appointments. She concluded that the Court System is prepared to implement these provisions. SENATOR ELLIS thanked Ms. Meade for supporting the bill. CHAIR DYSON expressed hope that the administration would also support the bill. 10:08:16 AM SENATOR GIESSEL moved to report CS for SB 64, labeled 28- LS0116\C, from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSSB 64(STA) was reported from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.