HB 373-STATE TREASURY WARRANTS  CHAIR GARY STEVENS announced HB 373 to be the final order of business. He then called a brief at ease from 5:00 to 5:05 p.m. TAPE 04-31, SIDE A  5:05 p.m.    REPRESENTATIVE MAX GRUENBERG, as a member of the House State Affairs Committee, explained that HB 373 cures a long-standing problem between commercial banks and the State of Alaska relating to a policy the State had of dishonoring their own warrants without any notification. The issue was litigated and the Alaska Supreme Court held that state treasure warrants were negotiable instruments under the Uniform Commercial Code and were therefore subject to the "holder in due course" defense. Although the State amended its business practices to comply with the ruling, the statutes have never been amended. CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked him to define the term negotiable instrument. REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said negotiable instrument means that it's a piece of paper that says, "Pay somebody some thing." According to the Uniform Commercial Code, the instrument must be honored unless the drawer has gone through the specific and formal process indicating that the instrument should be dishonored. This protects the banking community and it protects commerce, he said. There were no questions. SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS motioned to report HB 373 and attached fiscal notes from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered.