HB 215- ONE PERCENT FOR ART  BARBARA BITNEY, staff to Representative Bill Stoltze, explained the original legislation was to repeal the one percent for art requirement, but after working with the Alaska State Council of the Arts the bill would: · Apply only to state funding not federal funding · Cap the one percent for a project at the first $10 million and at one-half percent thereafter. · Set aside five percent of the one percent for maintenance · The Council would monitor and facilitate the maintenance and restoration of existing art works. · Strengthen the Alaska artist's preference · Provide for reporting from state departments to the Council · Require the Council to report to Legislative Budget and Audit Committee on an annual basis SENATOR FRED DYSON asked what type of savings they anticipate. MS. BITNEY explained that the attached report actually provides the best information available because each agency tracks funding differently, which makes the information difficult to piece together. CHAIR GARY STEVENS said he has followed the issue with interest and would like her to expand on the changes made to the original legislation. MS. BITNEY said it now applies only to general fund expenditure rather than the total construction cost. Federal funds are no longer included. SENATOR DYSON asked whether they addressed anomalies such as performing arts centers where the entire building is arguably dedicated to the arts. Would the one percent for art requirement still apply in those instances? MS. BITNEY replied this was a compromise since the original legislation was to repeal the requirement altogether. SENATOR DYSON asked about facilities that aren't readily available to the public. MS. BITNEY explained the one percent for art program is for buildings that have substantial public use and the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities make that determination. SENATOR GUESS asked why federal funds were no longer included. MS. BITNEY replied it reduces the required allocation. If you were to use the Anchorage Airport as an example and consider the federal funds that have been added over time, the art allocation would be impossibly large. SENATOR GUESS made a motion to move HB 215 and attached zero fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered.