HB 1-STALKING & PROTECTIVE ORDERS  REPRESENTATIVE CHERYLL HEINZE, bill sponsor, paraphrased the sponsor statement: HB 1 closes a dangerous loophole in the Alaska statutes, by allowing unacquainted victims of stalking to enjoy the security of a judicial protective order. Current law provides protection to those in domestic situations and minor children, but enjoins the victims of strangers from equal protection of the law. HB 1 allows the victims of stalking to seek and obtain a protective order in cases of stalking that are not crimes involving domestic violence. The bill streamlines the process for public safety and judicial practitioners by harmonizing the arrest and notification procedures to mirror those already in place for domestic violence situations. The bill adds the crime of violation of a child protective order and of a violation of a stalking protective order; these changes also reflect existing practitioner procedures. There were no questions. MARY WELLS testified via teleconference from Anchorage to relate a story about a man who stalked her family for a three-month period in 2001. Because the man was not a relative or domestic partner, she had no legal standing to obtain a protective order. This bill would remedy that loophole. REPRESENTATIVE HEINZE stated she, too, was stalked during her campaign. It was a terrifying experience and the police were unable to offer any real help. CHAIR GARY STEVENS said there isn't any protection unless there is a family connection. SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS replied it goes farther than that. There isn't any protection unless it is a domestic violence situation, which makes it very restrictive. CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked for a motion. SENATOR GUESS made a motion to move HB 1 from committee with individual recommendations and attached zero fiscal notes. There being no objection, it was so ordered.