HB 52-SEX CRIME AND PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES    CHAIR GARY STEVENS announced HB 52 is a bill relating to the forfiture of property used to possess or distribute child pornography. REPRESENTATIVE LESIL McGUIRE, bill sponsor, explained the bill passed the House in this form both last year and this year and they would appreciate support from the Senate. This would allow the sentencing judge the additional punitive option of seizing the equipment used in the commission of the sex or pornography crime. Of course the offender could repurchase the same type of equipment at some point in the future, but the point is to be punitive and not return equipment that used to commit the crime. An ancillary benefit to law enforcement agencies is they may use the offender's equipment to learn more about predatory techniques. She was aware Senator Dyson had an amendment to include the corpus of SB 96 and she supported the inclusion. CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked if the bill passed the House unanimously during the previous session, which would mean the three former House members on the committee voted in favor of the legislation. REPRESENTATIVE McGUIRE agreed that was the case. SENATOR JOHN COWDERY commented he receives numerous unsolicited and unsavory emails on his home computer and he finds filters not altogether satisfactory. He wondered if she might address that problem in future legislation. REPRESENTATIVE McGUIRE said she is committed to continue to work on the problem. There are some first amendment concerns related to eliminating SPAM. She believes legislation is appropriate but not entirely effective. SENATOR COWDERY suggested requesting help from the U.S. Senators. SENATOR FRED DYSON said he appreciates the concern and has become increasingly cynical. The amendment he proposes targets the money connection. Six states have passed laws that make it a crime to service the billing function of pornographic sites. To his knowledge, none of those billing services are currently operating in Alaska, but there may well be in the future. Server farms where all the electronic data resides don't have to be where the originator, the consumer, or the billing function occurs. His amendment [SB 96] allows the law to go after the billing firms that provide the connections. SENATOR DYSON made a motion to adopt a conceptual amendment to include the contents of SB 96 with CSHB 52. It is his understanding that if both pass, legislative legal would merge the two bills and possibly change the title, which would require a concurrent resolution. Amendment #1 was adopted without objection. SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS asked if "providing the billing collection" applied only to billing companies in Alaska because if every state passed this type of legislation it would force these billing companies to go overseas to conduct business. SENATOR DYSON said this posts a "no trespassing" sign at Alaska boundaries and those companies would stay away. States that don't pass this type of legislation would become a refuge and they would have a growth industry. SENATOR COWDERY suggested contacting the U.S. Senators to make the law as tough as possible. SENATOR GUESS agreed with Senator Cowdery and noted the next difficulty is overseas. CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked the record to reflect Lt. Matt Leveque from Anchorage was on line to answer questions. There were no further questions or comments. SENATOR GUESS made a motion to move SCS CSHB 52 (STA) from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note. Included was a motion for a concurrent resolution for change of title. There being no objection, it was so ordered.