SJR 6-CONST AM: 90 DAY LEGISLATIVE SESSION  SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS, bill sponsor, explained the resolution would place a constitutional amendment on the ballot to change the current 120-day legislative session to a 90-day legislative session. She opined legislators could accomplish their work in that time frame and save the state $888 thousand a year. CHAIR TAYLOR called for questions. SENATOR COWDERY asked whether she would support elimination of the five-day notification rule. SENATOR GUESS said she would give it some thought. CHAIR TAYLOR said the issue needs periodic debate. Legislators haven't received a salary increase for 16 years and perhaps reducing the length of the session would allow more people to participate in the legislative process. He thought the work could be accomplished in a shortened time frame, but he couldn't say whether it would result in better legislation for the people of Alaska. SENATOR COWDERY noted he has been as busy in the interim as he is during the 120-day session. CHAIR TAYLOR said legislative leaders always have demands upon their time and are busy year round. The questions of how they go about doing business and whether more or less should be done in the interim are policy calls that are deserving of review. SENATOR DYSON identified with the Chair's ambiguous feelings and expressed a desire to hear additional testimony before passing the bill to the next committee. He wanted to hear about any impacts experienced by other states after shortening their legislative sessions. He also wanted to hear from political scientists because he could argue that shortening session length could change the balance of power vis-à-vis the administration. In addition it might rob power from a minority that uses deadlines to force the majority into accommodations. He asked what the other committees of referral were and where the Chair expected the continued debate to occur. CHAIR TAYLOR replied the next committee is Judiciary and then the bill would be referred to Finance because a fiscal note would be attached to put the issue on the ballot. He anticipates the major debate would occur in the Judiciary Committee. The Senate President is seated there and he hopes they would take the time to discuss the bill. Moving bills stimulates interest in a debate. SENATOR DYSON said that would be fine, but because it is a bill dealing with a fundamental role of a branch of government, he thought State Affairs is the committee where substantive debate on the philosophical and policy issues should occur. SENATOR GUESS made a commitment to Senator Dyson to begin collecting information on lessons learned from other states as well as from the academic community. CHAIR TAYLOR had no objection to holding additional hearings in the State Affairs Committee, but he contends movement from one committee to another serves to stimulate interest and discussion. He said he would entertain a motion to move the bill, but none was forthcoming. SENATOR DYSON assured members his questions were not meant to kill the bill and he looked forward to hearing enlightened and expert opinion on the matter. CHAIR TAYLOR held SJR 6 in committee and announced the bill would be heard in two weeks.