SJR 17-FEDERAL GUN POLICIES  JOE STEWART, staff for Senator Donley, said SJR 17 requests that President Bush renounce and reverse the Clinton Administration anti-gun ownership policies and reorient the United States Department of Justice toward policies that accurately reflect the intent of the Second Amendment granting the individual rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. The legislation stems from a 1998 district court case in Tom Green County, Texas - a divorce case in which the wife put a restraining order on her husband. Because he owned a firearm, he was found to be in violation of Title 18, Section 922G8 of the U.S. Code, which states that anyone under a restraining order may not own a firearm. Because this was a federal violation, the case was transferred to federal district court where the judge ruled Title 18 of the U.S. Code unconstitutional because it violates Second Amendment rights. This was appealed to the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans where the U.S. attorney argued that the Second Amendment does not protect Second Amendment freedoms for individuals but gives a blanket protection to recognized groups such as the National Guard. In response, the National Rifle Association (NRA) sent a letter to the solicitor general asking whether the attorney had, in fact, accurately represented the position taken by the United States. The response was, "He had indeed." It was the opinion of the Department of Justice that there are no Second Amendment freedoms guaranteed for individual Americans. CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT introduced the work draft, CS 22-LS0443\B Luckhaupt 3/19/01, which melds the two "whereas paragraphs" on page 2, lines 4-9. He asked whether Senator Donley, sponsor of the resolution, had seen the new language and the position he was taking on the rewording. MR. STEWART said the change is acceptable to Senator Donley. SENATOR PEARCE moved the CS for SJR 17, B version by Mr. Luckhaupt 3/19/01, as the working document. CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT added that the committee substitute (CS) also directs a copy to be sent to the minority leader of the U.S. Congress. The CS was adopted with no objection. There were no other amendments offered, no questions, and no further testimony on SJR 17. He asked for the will of the committee. Number 466 SENATOR PEARCE moved CSSJR 17(STA) and zero fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections.