SENATOR THERRIAULT asked for a review of HB 348-VIOLATION OF A  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER. REPRESENTATIVE ERIC CROFT, sponsor of HB 348, described the bill as a simple measure that describes the knowledge requirement one needs to show to prove violation of a domestic violence restraining order. He said a court opinion was issued last year in which the judge could not determine the legislature's intention. Because of that opinion, it is almost impossible to prosecute these cases. The defense can rely on an unreasonable mistake of fact so that if the defendant believed something, no matter how "off-the-wall," a jury cannot determine it to be unreasonable. As an example, he noted that an individual might claim to have not known that a phone call would be considered a means of communication in regard to a restraining order. Representative Croft said the current standard requires a prosecutor to prove what "is in a person's head." The court opinion has caused a lot of consternation in the prosecutorial community. Representative Croft said that HB 348 contains a middle ground standard. SENATOR ELLIS moved to calendar HB 348 and its two accompanying fiscal notes at the Chairman's discretion. SENATOR COWDERY objected. CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS announced that the motion to calendar HB 348 carried with Senators Therriault, Ellis and Phillips in favor and Senator Cowdery opposed.