CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS announced the committee would take up HCR 23- LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES: SPLIT HOUSE HESS. He noted that Senate members have a lot of questions about this bill so his plan is to hold it in committee until those questions are answered. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked if the House Majority Caucus instructed Representative Bunde to introduce this measure or whether it was his idea. MS. KAREN MCCARTY, staff to Representative Bunde, informed members that Representative Guess first sponsored a resolution to split the committee. The House Special Committee on Education supported the idea and introduced HCR 23. The House discussion centered on the fact that education is a core constitutional mandate and, aside from permanent fund dividends, it is the highest expense of state government. The House felt that a standing committee on education would allow legislators to focus on the topic more than is currently possible. Because the House recognized that the Senate might not be interested in doing the same, it structured the resolution so as not to affect Senate committee structure. Tam Cook, legal counsel, found no legal requirement for image committees in the House and Senate. SENATOR COWDERY asked what is broken and whether another standing committee will require extra work and more personnel. MS. MCCARTY said she doesn't know that House members felt something was broken but they did feel the situation could be improved. Representative Bunde stated that from his six years of experience chairing House HESS, and two years chairing the Special Committee on Education, a standing committee on education would be very beneficial. The Legislative Affairs Agency prepared a zero fiscal note, indicating that no additional staff would be required. In looking through the bills that have been referred to both the House HESS Committee and Special Committee on Education, there does not appear to have been any overlap of health and social services issues and education issues during the past two years. She said she believes that creation of a standing committee will require less work on the part of the Department of Education and Early Development (DOEED). SENATOR COWDERY asked how many members serve on the two existing committees. MS. MCCARTY said seven on each, although three members are common to both committees. SENATOR HALFORD said during the time he has served in the legislature, three or four proposals have come up to split committees: splitting the Resources Committee into renewable and non-renewable resource committees; splitting the HESS committee; and splitting the Finance Committee into an appropriations committee and a ways and means committee. He said what makes sense for a 40 member House does not necessarily make sense for a 20 member Senate. What has kept it from happening is not the legal issue, but the attitude that the public understanding of the process benefits by having similar structures in both bodies. He advised Ms. McCarty that the House needs a strong argument to change that attitude. SENATOR HALFORD acknowledged that the House, as an organization, always needs more committees and creates special committees to "fill in the number of people it is trying to keep in an organization." The Senate always has too many committees so that Finance Committee members must chair a standing committee or, at times, one Senator chairs more than one standing committee. He said the request to split a committee is not unreasonable given the operating structure of the House, but the question is do legislators want to change the Uniform Rule that designates the same standing committees in both bodies. He suggested that another way to get the same result is to add, in Section 1, a specific provision so that by resolution, either body could split a committee for a session. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked if the two committees would share the same committee room. MS. MCCARTY said that could occur. This session, the Special Committee on Education met in the House Judiciary Committee room in the morning and then used the House Finance room after subcommittees finished their work. SENATOR THERRIAULT said he agrees with Senator Halford that the House needs more committees but it has taken care of that problem by creating special committees over the years or by appointing co-chairs. He pointed out that by using co-chairs, the workload is split and the committee can meet at the same time in the same place on different days. He expressed concern that HCR 23 will not work down the line because of the need for dedicated space. MS. MCCARTY said there has not been a lot of discussion in the House about the logistical details; however, the operations of the special committee have worked smoothly so she sees no reason that the operations of a standing committee would not be the same. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked if education-related legislation is only referred to the Special Committee on Education and by-passes the House HESS Committee. MS. MCCARTY said quite a few bills received a double referral to both the House HESS Committee and Special Committee on Education. The House HESS Committee had 42 education-related bills referred to it, most of those were previously heard in the special committee. Her understanding, from Mr. Wright, is that all education-related legislation, except bonding issues, was referred to both. CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked, if the bills moved from the Special Committee on Education to the House HESS Committee, how HCR 23 will improve anything. He said he has a saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," and is trying to understand how HCR 23 will improve anything. MS. MCCARTY said one of the benefits, if HCR 23 passes, will be a more efficient use of time because legislation will not need double committee referrals. CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS maintained that Ms. McCarty said that many of the education-related bills were referred to both committees. He then asked if those bills will be referred to only one of those committees if HCR 23 passes. MS. MCCARTY said that is correct. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked why that is not done now. MR. TOM WRIGHT, staff to Representative Porter, Speaker of the House, explained that every bill needs a referral to a standing committee. SENATOR THERRIAULT asked if most of the bills that got the double referral were referred to other standing committees. MR. WRIGHT said those that needed an additional referral were given one - it depended on the content of the bill. However, if the bill needed no other referrals, it was referred to House HESS. CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS noted that all bills must go through the Rules Committee. MR. WRIGHT said that is correct but the House has a different Rules process. CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS announced the committee would take up HB 262.