HB 272-MUNICIPAL TAX: LOW INCOME HOUSING CHAIRMAN KELLY announced that a proposed Senate Rules Committee substitute had been drafted labeled "Version T." MR. JONATHAN LACK, legislative aide to Representative Halcro, sponsor of the measure, explained Version T as follows. Version T is Representative Halcro's preferred version. It says that for IRS-qualified low income housing, the municipal assessment shall be based on the actual income derived from the property recognizing the deed restrictions on that property. The second change says that the governing body of the local municipality shall determine by ordinance whether the properties that qualify for the low income housing tax credits after the date of the act shall be exempt from the requirements of the assessment procedure in the first section. For properties that have been exempted by ordinance, the governing body may determine by parcel which method of assessment will be used and may not change the manner of assessment if there is outstanding original debt on that property. CHAIRMAN KELLY asked if "by parcel," Mr. Lack meant by project. MR. LACK said yes. CHAIRMAN KELLY stated that all of the old projects are grand fathered in and any new projects are local option - project by project. MR. LACK agreed. SENATOR LEMAN clarified, for the record, that the term "actual income derived" pertains to that market. It does not mean that someone can, through bad management, actually cause a depression of the market value of that property. It is actual income derived at market and that the assessor assumed some type of vacancy factor for income property that is applied for that particular unit. MR. LACK agreed that is correct and noted that he spoke with the state assessor, Steve VanZant. The term "actual income derived from the property" means at market so if a property has a 60 percent occupancy but the market provides for an 80 percent occupancy, it will be assessed at 80 percent. That will provide no incentive for an owner to underfill a unit to get a break on property taxes. The amendment that came out of the Senate Finance Committee added "at full occupancy." The intent was to address a situation in which someone might intentionally underfill a unit. That amendment was problemative because "at full occupancy" ends up meaning that if there is a significant downturn in the rental market, for example if Elmendorf Airforce Base closed, ten percent would be the market occupancy rate and the unit would still have to pay taxes on 100 percent occupancy. Version T clears that problem up. SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt Version T as the Senate Rules Committee substitute. There being no objection, the motion carried. SENATOR LEMAN moved to calendar all Senate versions of HB 272 for calendaring at the Chairman's discretion. There being no objection, the motion carried.