CSHB 382(FIN)-CLEANUP OF ILLEGAL DRUG SITES  CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced CSHB 382(FIN) to be up for consideration. SENATOR TAYLOR moved to adopt Amendment 1, which reads as follows. 22-LS1105\S.2 Lauterbach 1/10/03 A M E N D M E N T 1 OFFERED IN THE SENATE TO: SCS CSHB 382( ), Draft Version "S" Page 2, line 4, following "made.": Insert "The owner of the property may appeal the determination to the superior court for review of whether the determination was made in compliance with this subsection. In the appeal, the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the determination was made in compliance with this subsection is on the law enforcement agency that employed the officer who made the determination." Page 2, line 6: Delete "by certified mail, return receipt requested," Insert "given in a manner that is consistent with the rules of civil procedure for the service of process in a civil action in this state" Page 5, line 29: Delete "or" Page 6, line 2, following "met": Insert "; or (3) a court has held that the determination that the property was an illegal drug manufacturing site was not made in compliance with AS 46.03.500(a)" Page 6, line 30: Delete "a reasonably clear possibility" Insert "reasonable cause to suspect the existence" Page 7, line 3: Delete "occurs" Insert "has occurred" CHAIRMAN TORGERSON objected to the motion for the purpose of hearing an explanation. REPRESENTATIVE GUESS, sponsor of HB 382, said Amendment 1 makes her bill a much better one. The first part of the amendment sets up an appeal process available to the residential owner if a drug lab is determined to be an illegal lab site. It also makes the notification process consistent with the civil procedure for service so that a person can also be physically served with certified mail. Language on page 6, line 2, states that the property can be fit for use if the court determines that it was not an illegal lab site. Finally, it changes the phrase, "a reasonably clear possibility," which is language used in another state, to "reasonable cause to suspect," a phrase used in this state. SENATOR TAYLOR called for the question. There were no further objections and Amendment 1 was adopted. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON referred to language on page 3, lines 16 and 17, "occupy the property at any time after the fourth day following the day that the property was posted" and asked if committee members were comfortable with the four day provision. REPRESENTATIVE GUESS indicated that was okay. SENATOR TAYLOR explained that the time frame was shorter in some states and longer in others. SENATOR WILKEN moved to report SCS CSHB 382(RES) from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. There were no objections and it was so ordered.