SB 153-UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK LOAN FUND    CHAIRMAN TORGERSON announced SB 153 to be up for consideration. He said that the committee substitute (CS) says that if a company is large enough to be covered under EPA regulations, it would not be eligible for a loan. TAPE 01-32, SIDE A    MR. JOHN BARNETT, a contractor providing support services to the Board of Storage Tank Assistance, supported the committee substitute and the section that refers to self-insurance. This would eliminate companies that would still remain eligible for a loan from the state, such as Chevron, Tesoro and Williams. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON said that it eliminates anyone with net assets over $10 million. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if it eliminates municipalities. MR. BARNETT said that municipalities are specifically mentioned in section 16 and it does not apply. SENATOR ELTON asked, regarding language on page 8, lines 30 - 31, why they are requiring a form to be developed through the regulatory process. He was concerned that might take awhile. MS. ANNETTE KREITZER, staff to Senator Leman, sponsor, responded that they have already gone through the financial responsibility process through regulation and she didn't think it would be that difficult for them to go through it one more time. MR. BARNETT explained that two years ago, Senator Torgerson developed a net worth filter for the grant applicant in SB 128 and it was available to the public by August 1. He said they could get this out fairly quickly. MS. KREITZER said creating the form by regulation is federal language and the committee doesn't have to require that to be done. CHAIRMAN TORGERSON asked Mr. Barnett what he thought about creating the form in regulation. MR. BARNETT said he thought the [Board of Storage Tank Assistance] could review that issue before the bill got to the Finance Committee, but he didn't see any problem with it. SENATOR TAYLOR moved to adopt committee substitute Cook 4/23/01 as the working document. There were no objections and it was so ordered. SENATOR TAYLOR moved to pass CSSB 153(RES) from committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.