SB 38-OIL & GAS AUDITS  CHAIRMAN HALFORD announced SB 38 to be up for consideration. MR. KEVIN BANKS, Division of Oil and Gas, DNR, said SB 38 is a housekeeping bill that transfers the authority to audit royalty revenue that comes to DNR via lease contracts and other methods from the Department of Revenue (DOR) to DNR. It also provides DNR with tools to conduct the audits effectively. DNR's current statute (AS 38) has a confidentiality requirement but it contains no criminal penalties for misconduct. Under SB 38, DNR's audit requirements would be tighter and would reflect those in AS 43, which governs the audits done by DOR. SB 38 also gives subpoena authority to DNR when conducting an audit, which DOR now has. The fiscal note reflects a cost of $233,000 to pay for the transfer of staff from DOR to DNR. CHAIRMAN HALFORD asked why the money in the fiscal note is listed as permanent fund corporate receipts. MR. BANKS replied that's because last year DOR identified the positions as funded with permanent fund revenue. Those same funds will be coming DNR's way. CHAIRMAN HALFORD said he would want to know that the permanent fund is the potential beneficiary to determine whether that is the right funding source. MR. BANKS explained that DNR has some staff who "check the checkers" on current audits. They are also doing contract reviews for royalty settlements and looking at various royalty and kinds of audits that are not now covered by AS 43. With the combination of staff, including those from DOR, it would approximately equal the portion of the revenue stream that goes to the permanent fund, about 27 percent of their royalty revenue. After transfer of this authority, they would have seven or eight people on staff doing audits. Three of them would be funded by this $233,000. CHAIRMAN HALFORD asked if three-eighths of the activity is to the benefit of the permanent fund. MR. BANKS agreed that is about right but it is possible that more is coming out of the permanent fund than it receives in terms of benefits. He said it is a hard number to arrive at. SENATOR GREEN asked if SB 38 will allow DNR and DOR to exchange information and thereby increase the exposure of very confidential information to more eyes or whether that is not a consideration in this bill. MR. BANKS replied that under current law, DNR has access to audit reports and summaries. In addition, according to Department of Law opinions written in the 1980's, for the purposes of conducting DNR's royalty function, DNR should have access to any information it deems necessary. His staff would have to meet the requirements for maintaining confidentiality of information received from DOR and be subject to AS 43 criminal penalties. CHAIRMAN HALFORD said it looks like, in either case, the penalty is a felony for disclosing the information. He said he didn't have any trouble with this legislation but would hold it until Wednesday.