SR 2 OPPOSE COAL AS HAZARDOUS/NOXIOUS SUBSTNCE  SENATOR LEMAN announced SR 2 to be up for consideration. CHARLES BODDY, Alaska Coal Association and Usibelli Coal Mine, said other coal producing states are doing the same thing in their state legislatures to get a message clearly sent to the U.S. Congress and the administration of the significance of the international maritime organizations seeking to include coal as a hazardous and noxious material. This issue is of importance to the board rooms of every coal producer in the U.S.. That the proposed tariff would be $4 per ton every time it's loaded or unloaded, which happens at least three times, is a lot considering they are fighting over pennies to stay in the marketplace. Every person dealing with coal as a bulk commodity for shipment has come out against it. The International Convention on Pollution From Ships has never classified coal as a hazardous material. All of the treaties and conventions that deal with coal being shipped or transported as a bulk commodity have always excluded coal as a dangerous, hazardous, or noxious material, MR. BODDY said. There have been no spills of record that have ever seen any problems caused in either the marine environment or along any coastline ecosystems. MR. BODDY said the Clinton administration is divided on the issue. The Department of Justice and the U.S. Coast Guard are inclined to favor coal as a noxious and hazardous substance, although in a different classification within the treaty system with more concerns revolving around the safety and health issues and spontaneous combustion. The maritime administration for the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Department of Commerce and the Department of Energy all favor the exclusion.