SENATOR MILLER announced SJR 38 (RESTRUCTURE PERMANENT FUND) to be e up for consideration. REPRESENTATAIVE JOHNNY ELLIS, sponsor, said if this passed it would significantly change they way the state conducts its finances. It proposes that all the natural resource revenues of the state flow into the Permanent Fund (PF) and that they adopt a system of gradually reigning in our expenditures and front loading the PF. The advantages to this are many. We could have a long range fiscal plan for the state. We would be able to capture windfalls for future use and not have the boom and bust cycle in state spending. We would be able to have a bigger PF and spend just earnings, not the principle. Number 381 ROGER CREMO, author of the resolution, testified from Anchorage that the resolution is self explanatory and he would answer their questions. SENATOR FRANK asked how the fluctuating value of the PF would be reflected in the amount the legislature could appropriate? MR. CREMO said there is a provision for averaging the value of the fund. It is a 12 quarter average and is purposely done on a calendar basis so that the last of the 12 quarters is the one ending on December 31 just before the legislature convenes which allows them to know to the penny how much money will be coming from the fund. SENATOR FRANK asked if they had considered writing the bill so that people could see how it was changed rather than just repealing and reenacting. MR. CREMO explained that the drafting attorney, Tamara Cook, suggested this way would be by far the clearest approach since the change was so radical. SENATOR LEMAN asked if he had given any more thought to the transition number. MR. CREMO said it could easily be less than 20. He used 20, because it seemed to produce numbers that at least started with the level of spending that the legislature is currently using. He said the lower the start of the percentage, the better the system will perform. SENATOR FRANK asked what opportunities there would be to take things off the budget. MR. CREMO said there isn't much room for the legislature as far as how much can come out of the fund. The percentage would be fixed in the constitution and the value of the fund would be fixed by the market average. There is no restriction on what the legislature could raise with non-resource revenues. There is no spending limit, nor does it tell the legislature what to do - anywhere. If the legislature would tax resources in the future, that money would go into the PF rather than the general fund. SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass SJR 38 from Committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.