SENATOR MILLER announced SB 217 (INCREASE LAND GRANT TO UNIV. OF ALASKA) to be up for consideration. RICK SOLIE, Aide to Senator Frank, said the two changes made in the proposed CS were the incorporation of an amendment that would not allow the University to select lands that are on the DNR's 5-year oil and gas leasing plan. The second changes the method of conveyance, because the survey would be costly. So they utilized the municipal selection process that is already in statute. Number 284 SENATOR FRANK moved to adopt the CS to SB 217 and asked for unanimous consent. There were no objections and it was so ordered. MR. SOLIE clarified that the University is allowed to take possession of a claim that is currently being held by a miner, but only after the lease has expired. SENATOR FRANK noted that there was no dedication of funds. This legislation would allow the University to be more equitable with other land grant universities in the United States. SENATOR PEARCE asked if their lands were in one place or spread out over the state. BRIAN ROGERS, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, said their land is spread throughout the state, although there is very little in the northern and western parts. He said the University had a much larger land grant, but due to lack of survey, lost that land grant with statehood. This bill redresses that old wrong. GERALD GALLAGHER, Department of Natural Resources, responded to the question of mining claims that they would remain under the management of the DNR. The income stream would continue to flow into the state treasury until the mining claim disappeared or was abandoned. The University could not come in and change the contract. He said their one concern with the bill is the conveyance of oil and gas to the University which is not in the best interest of the state. SENATOR FRANK said he appreciated that concern and reasoned if the University had a windfall, probably the state could step in and take it. He thought it was the legislature's call. Number 496 SENATOR FRANK moved to pass SB 217 with fiscal notes and asked for unanimous consent. There were no objections and it was so ordered.