SENATOR MILLER called the Resources Committee meeting to order at 3:45 p.m. and announced SB 77 INTENSIVE MANAGEMENT OF GAME RESOURCES to be up for consideration. SENATOR SHARP explained his proposed CS to SB 77. He said it accommodated most of the ADF&G amendments to the title. Number 111 SENATOR ADAMS moved to adopt the CS to SB 77 and asked for unanimous consent. There were no objections and it was so ordered. Number 120 RUSSELL HEATH, Alaska Environmental Lobby, opposed CSSB 77, because they believe that game should be managed for the health of the ecosystem and not specifically for human consumption. A healthy ecosystem will sustain all types of users over the long term. Number 134 MIKE DUBOWSKI supported intensive management for human use, because from a personal standpoint he depends on the resources, specifically mouse. He thought a lot of the areas he now uses would be closed, which means he would have to hunt in others areas, which,in turn, would make them overcrowded. Number 185 JOHN GEORGE, Alaska Outdoor Council, supported intensive management of the game resources on the limited amount of land we have left where the public can actually hunt and fish. Number 197 DAVE KELLEYHOUSE, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, said most of their recommendations had been accommodated in the CS. He has some problems with removal of (a)(11)c on page 2, because that referred to conducting intensive management where human consumption would be expected to increase significantly. MR. KELLEYHOUSE said their official position remains neutral until he reviews the CS. SENATOR SHARP said the underlying purpose behind this bill is to create legislative intent for intensive management with the least amount of wiggle room possible. Number 314 SENATOR PEARCE asked if they say "shall" to the Board rather than "may," does the Governor, then, have the authority to overturn a decision by the Board of Game? MR. KELLYHOUSE said they had looked at the word "shall" versus "may" and it says the Board of Game "shall" adopt regulations it considers advisable. In all instances when there is a disagreement between the Board and the Commissioner, the Governor is the ultimate arbiter of that impasse. Number 388 SENATOR FRANK moved to pass CSSB 77 from Committee with individual recommendations. SENATOR ADAMS objected and there was a roll call vote: SENATOR ADAMS: no; SENATOR PEARCE: yes; SENATOR FRANK: yes; SENATOR LEMAN: yes; SENATOR MILLER: yes; and SENATOR ZHAROFF: no; and CSSB 77 was discharged from Committee with a vote of 4 yeas and 2 nays.