SENATOR LEMAN announced the Committee would end the "work session" and begin the hearing portion of the meeting and brought SB 239 (NONCRUDE OIL OPERATIONS:FINANC'L RESPB'TY) up for consideration. Number 394 MEAD TREADWELL, Deputy Director, Department of Environmental Conservation, explained that the law requires people providing insurance as a form of financial responsibility have a policy which allows the insurer to be sued in a state court. Prior to Exxon Valdez no one had a problem getting this direct action insurance. After the Exxon Valdez, OPA '90 was passed requiring direct action insurance nationally. At that time, the London insurance market had stopped writing this kind of insurance as widely as it had. DEC was faced with a situation where they had to be able to grant waivers to small companies who could not get this kind of insurance or shut them down under the law. The legislature allowed them to grant waivers quarterly if people could not get direct action. In summary, MR. TREADWELL said, they support the intent of this bill and suggest a simple amendment in Section 1 making the waiver provision permanent. He explained that the waiver provision is very strictly enforced. SENATOR SALO remarked that the direct action insurance is available to some, but not to others and asked what is the difference. MR. TREADWELL answered part of it has to do with the position taken by the P&I clubs. He said approximately 12 people have been able to get it and about 20 haven't. He added that DEC enforces the general law on financial responsibility rigorously and there is 100% compliance. Number 506 RAY GILLESPIE, Petro Marine Services, Crowley Maritime, and Delta Western, said his companies do a good percentage of distribution of refined oil products in the state. Unavailability of direct action insurance has been a consistent problem since right after the Exxon Valdez. Prior to the Exxon Valdez direct action insurance has been available, but not through the London market which provides an indemnification type of contract reimbursing operators' claims. They have never agreed to be sued in every state. Companies satisfied the requirement prior to Exxon Valdez with an insurance product that was sold in the U.S. domestic insurance market. It was a binder of sorts that satisfied the direct action requirement. After the Exxon Valdez, that market dried up. No company that operates vessels or shore- side tank farms has gotten a direct action policy. Those that have been written are for the upland facilities and some of the larger exploration companies that fall under another risk category for insurance than his operators do. He supported the testimony from DEC and urged them to adopt the CS as distributed by staff. Number 544 BILL SCHOEPHOESTER, Petro Marine Service and Association of Refined Oil Distributors, said he has been working directly with his insurance company and has not been able to come up with any direct action insurance he can buy. He urged the committee to eliminate the temporary nature of the waiver. SENATOR LEMAN said they would take up SB 239 at their next meeting and hoped to move it from Committee and adjourned the meeting at 4:07 p.m.