SB 113-NURSING MOTHERS IN WORKPLACE    1:42:37 PM CHAIR ELLIS announced SB 113 to be up for consideration. PATRICK CUNNINGHAM, staff to Senator Ellis, sponsor of SB 113, explained the proposed CS [referred to as CSSB 113(L&C) 25- LS0435\E] made two changes. He said the intent of the CS was to provide more flexibility to the employer in terms of implementing the bill. One change was on page 1, line 10, that deleted "secure" and inserted "private and sanitary". The other change added a new section on page 1, line 13, that says nothing in this section requires an employer to allow a child in the workplace at times other than break times - in response to Senator Stevens' concern that an employer would have to provide day care and the child would be allowed to stay all day. SENATOR STEVENS moved to adopt version E for discussion purposes. There were no objections and it was so ordered. SENATOR STEVENS said he hadn't heard from business organizations like the Chamber of Commerce about the impact of providing a clean and private room and he would like to hear some feedback on that issue. 1:46:41 PM DENNY DEWITT, National Federal of Independent Business, opposed SB 113. The issue for them is not the efficacy of breastfeeding, because they have been able to work these issues out. He said, however, that some small employers who have a business in a mall may not even have a restroom of their own; so providing a private and sanitary room becomes a real problem. Putting this in the labor code would allow some inspector to make a judgment on what is an undue hardship for the employer. This person has no fiduciary responsibility for their decision. SENATOR STEVENS asked Mr. Cunningham what this measure would mean for public schools. MR. CUNNINGHAM replied he thought rooms for nursing teachers could be provided, but that would be up to the state agency that was charged with implementing the program to clarify. He hoped in the long run that the requirements would be minimal and that most facilities would be able to work something out for a nursing mother and child recognizing how important it is to promote the wellbeing of both. CHAIR ELLIS asked if he found information about how other countries handle this situation. MR. CUNNINGHAM answered he looked at the issue from the state perspective, not the international. All the Pacific states with the exception of Alaska have this friendly legislation in place already. Some studies of corporations have found accommodating nursing mothers benefits the employer because since their children are healthier, they don't have to miss work to care for sick ones. CHAIR ELLIS said this bill is a conversation starter and he would like to send it on; he knew that more debate needed to happen. SENATOR DAVIS commented that lots of employers already allow employees to have a place to nurse and express milk. It shouldn't be much of a problem in schools, because they already have at least a nurse's office that could be used for this purpose. Even small businesses could use just a cubicle. She thought most employees would probably go along with a good faith effort to provide a room. SENATOR DAVIS moved to report CSSB 113 (L&C) version E from committee with individual recommendations. There were no objections and it was so ordered.