SB 18-PROPERTY FORECLOSURES AND EXECUTIONS    CHAIR ELLIS announced SB 18 to be up for consideration. He asked Bryan Merrell, First American Title Insurance Co., Seattle, Washington, if he had any comments to make. MR. MERRELL responded that he was available to answer questions. 1:33:29 PM SENATOR BUNDE mentioned that he had a proposed CS to SB 18 [25- LS0153\ L] that Mr. Routh would explain. STEPHAN ROUTH, Crabtree Routh, explained that the CS has changes in five areas. The first is an inconsistency in terminology between "grantor" and "trustor". It's a technical change and has been made consistently "trustor" throughout the document. The second change is also technical that sets up parameters for the length of time for publishing on the Website. The third change clarifies why the Website for dissemination of the information has to be free to the public for viewing. SENATOR DAVIS joined the committee at 1:34:36 PM. MR. ROUTH continued explaining that the fourth item adds language to clarify that "physical possession" means actual physical possession. So, in two places in section 4 the word "actual" or "actually" has been added. Last, a typo that read "and" in section 11 was corrected to "or". CHAIR ELLIS mentioned that they are referring to the Bannister CSSB 18, version L. SENATOR BUNDE moved to adopt CSSB 18(L&C), version L. There were no objections and it was so ordered. 1:36:33 PM SENATOR BUNDE said the changes to the foreclosure procedure were technical and made for a more efficient and consumer friendly law. The bill had not changed substantially from the original. It would allow people to bid on a foreclosure property and use it as a residence and assume the American dream. CHAIR ELLIS said he personally supported his goal and asked if he would be able to get all the commercials off late-night TV that promote wealth-creating systems built around flipping properties with no money down. SENATOR BUNDE replied that while the Alaska State Senate has awesome power, it has its limitations. SENATOR HOFFMAN joined the committee at 1:38:02 PM. SENATOR STEVENS asked what "actually in physical possession" means. MR. ROUTH explained the intent was to deal with a Supreme Court case heard a few years ago called the Nystrom v. Buckhorn that set up standards that were hard for the title industry to conform to. So, the intent of this language is to make the meaning absolutely clear that somebody has to actually be physically occupying the property. CHAIR ELLIS noted there was no opposition to the bill and he saw nothing in the CS that would trigger a new fiscal note, which was zero. SENATOR BUNDE said he had heard of no opposition either and moved to pass CSSB 18(L&C). There were no objections and it was so ordered.